spoken by someone without any original intellectual property? if intellectual property was not scarce and was not the entire focus of the digital currency movement (materialism at it peak) - it would not be valuable. the nature of work is literally valuable because in a node-to-node transfer, it is sourced and archived and catalogued. you literally cannot be someone advocating for a digital marketplace and be against ip, and that has nothing to do with common law - actually the reverse. ip guarantees a free flow of data; delete ip laws is like saying humans should not have names and identities.