Nostr Web Client

BTC is a 3 letter word made by a 3 letter agency change my mind? 😆

Still doesn't mean it can't be fixed, every problem can be fixed with the right tools, materials and method.

Some problems like a virus ridden HDD are best to nuke it and start again.

I mean this is the risk we have, a 'manhattan project 2.0'.

A dilemma whereby some crazy tyrant and his crazy evil scientist believed this atomic chain reaction would destroy the whole world and universe...

And they did it anyway!!!! 😱🤬😂🤣

What good is anything if we let these lunatics, psychopaths and tyrants rule us?

#BTC #An0myl0u5_Net #DePol nostr:nprofile1qqst8av970sr3uwueha094apgjdyrps9cwfv6va60ufhhj3yssh4lyqwd77ju let's get this discussion going dude.

What are the problems and what are the solutions?

I am not suggesting BTC needs nuking and a new crypto developed.

I am not developing a cryptocurrency.

Decentralise the politics and return to democratic control.

Turn the tables before you lose it all.

⬇️replies welcome below⬇️ 😁

https://www.cryptopolitan.com/bitcoin-is-now-a-matter-of-national-security/?utm_source=thecryptoapp

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Vyram Kraven 8mo ago

Problems hmm I read the link & I think. The blockchain how it's built is the problem. As i've always said a public ledger showing every transaction ever made from the start is wrong. No system not even banks have a public record since the history of banks opening.

Which is why I always recommend XMR because of the fact transactions are not public record. I've always said btc won't last forever because of how transparent it is. With news of governments using ai to try to understand blockchain technology better should be a clear warning sign to everyone.

The days are coming sooner then everyone thinks when ai will help goverments make a crack in btc then they will control it, monitor it, & use it as a trap. I'm afraid the public won't realize it because then government is giving themselves pats on the back job well done they think btc is good for them too bad they don't know we did a hostile takeover.

The solution would be to make a new currency but the whole tech behind it needs to be from scratch. Made by people who are not data harvesters & profit from knowing what everyone in the world is doing. Remember anything transparent as such including nostr was made with the interests of data collectors in mind which is why everythings transparent like some sports statistics.

It has to be built by people who want privacy, people who can develop crazy complex traffic packet control, & rulesets for incoming connections.

An0myl0u5 8mo ago

Yes I agree a lot here. I am attempting to integrate into the real world for various reasons.

My proposition is a fully decentralised chain, every wallet runs a micro node and stores its own critical data.

Must KYC as it is a voting app.

ONLY you have that data. It is ZK proof and only a hash of that is given to anyone else when you allow it.

I suppose that is only necessary if you want to bite, the infrastructure could still be used without.

BTC can be ZK wrapped that adds an extra layer of anonymity and security.

Communication is directly p2p, people use the 'WWW' internet but if your ISP goes down now like I'm sure Spain, France and Portugal had no Internet providers on the ground, in the blackout they could have switched on PAN personal are network or WAN.

This system would be best ran that way but I'm not sure how overseas comms would work.

Because the P2p is invite based only discoverable if you choose and to who you choose.

And it runs a mesh architecture decentralised, encrypted and direct communication can be easily setup from neighbour to neighbour.

A whole new crypto could be developed but that's beyond my scope.

And to be honest, a waste of time.

Fiat money wouldn't need fixing either if we had control of our politicians. The bankers the lobbyists and rhe regulators.

People just don't seem to want to understand this.

It can be done, but if they all agree to get all the money power and control. They are unified in their agenda.

In the mean time fractal individualism and ignorance prevents anybody else from agreeing on anything else at all ever 🫠

Vyram Kraven 8mo ago

Sounds like a good idea but the kyc part i'm not so sure of. I would think an address & a password exchange between those people wpuld be better. I'm afraid that google willow might crack any encryption today. So something with a password serial would be better in my opinion.

The idea may only feel a waste of time because if begun you would begin building alone. I wish I was coding smart enough to build something from scratch but it's beyond my comprehension. I am at best a tinkerer in what I can understand. To begin building you would need 10 people with the same understanding.

I agree with you 100% individualism & ignorance keeps us divided as they wanted. We grow up with things like express yourself then ignore the hater, then believe in yourself, follow your heart, & be happy. All the keywords to tell you subliminaly don't think for yourself, trust in only your emotions, be concerned with if you're good enough & last suck a dick! Everything to keep us from being unified to overpower them in a consensus vote.

An0myl0u5 8mo ago

The thing is if people use it or just download it and it gets enough users, with the political voting function off - obviously.

The network voting function can still be used for development and feature improvements and its other uses.

People can pressure the government's into it.

Better still I have a plan for my gov anyway.

This product can fix problems they want fixing without us voting on it.

They just won't want the part I am enthusiastic about.

And it's not for them it's for us.

They won't want XMR either no way that's why everyone de-listed it.

I dont know how to seperate what they need to get them adopted from what we need.

They won't have much influence over the network just their node, so updating later with the voting function might be the better way forward, then they can choose to accept or not.

If not people might go crazy and force them, obviously people need to understand the product and the importance of voting or having influence or policy.

And it's hard to get anyone interested.

If the app was on phones and people seen its value they might just protest and pressure enough for compliance.