The fact 'trans' means 'across' or 'BEYOND' does that not mean simply it is not real gender, or it is at least modified 'across' which would make it synthetic life technically... lol.
trans-
/tran(t)s,trɑːn(t)s,tranz,trɑːnz/
prefix
prefix: trans-
1.
across; beyond.
"transcontinental"
on or to the other side of.
"transatlantic"
2.
through.
"transonic"
into another state or place.
"transform"
surpassing; transcending.
"transfinite"
3.
referring or relating to people whose gender identity does not correspond with the sex registered for them at birth.
"transgender"
4.
Chemistry
denoting molecules with trans arrangements of substituents.
"trans -1,2-dichloroethene"
Genetics
denoting alleles on different chromosomes
Crazy people, got religious cuckold syndrome.
The British might as well take it back. Probably safer for the world 😄
A bad decision. I am of the school of thought we all make the same mistake upto but not including 3 times. Lol.
You make it once, second time you identify it or possibly not until you are passed the point of return and are committed to the mistake again.
In theory the second time you should have actively recognised the mistake, but not necessarily soon or we'll enough to digress.
If you did make the same mistake twice that's OK still, as long as you recognise and learn from it.
3rd time...
Well if you keep doing it then maybe you have other issues like you don't listen to advice, or you don't think before you speak, do not prioritise properly, those type of issues.
Wtf the gaslighting is real.
Bibi and the golden pager...
I wonder if he is playing everyone, even his owners.
Or if the first 4 years was a 'stand down psyop'... hmmm....
A lot of things have started behaving badly in the last few hours.
Orchestrated terrorism.
Hodl till they out you in jail.
Bitcoin should never be taxed or investable by central banks, or tradeable in false economies.
It's antithetical.
DFINITY and ICP surveillance state...
World Economic Forum and Global Governance Connections
DFINITY's alignment with global elite structures is evidenced by direct participation in World Economic Forum activities 1. Dominic Williams served as a speaker at the WEF Davos 2024 event, participating in a panel titled "Here to Stay: How Blockchains are Reshaping Our World" 13. This participation signals alignment with the WEF's agenda of technological governance and centralized oversight of blockchain development 1.
The WEF has actively promoted crypto-enabled ESG initiatives through its Crypto Impact and Sustainability Accelerator (CISA), launched in partnership with CoinDesk 27. This framework positions blockchain technology as a tool for implementing global governance mechanisms rather than enabling true decentralization 27.
Government Partnerships and Surveillance Expansion
DFINITY has established formal partnerships with multiple government entities that directly contradict claims of decentralized operation 1420. In September 2024, the foundation signed a Letter of Intent with Cambodia's Ministry of Industry, Science, Technology and Innovation to explore blockchain applications for "significant digital infrastructure projects" 14. This partnership explicitly focuses on "sovereign cloud technology" and "smart city infrastructure" - terminology typically associated with government surveillance and control systems 14.
The foundation's Chief Business Officer, Pierre Samaties, served on a specialized advisory panel for the Abu Dhabi Department of Government Enablement's "Decentralized Trust and Blockchain strategy" 20. These government advisory roles demonstrate institutional capture rather than independence from state power 20.
Military-Intelligence Complex Integration
The most revealing connection is DFINITY's Chief Operating Officer Josh Drake, whose background spans the U.S. Marine Corps (2003-2007), law enforcement (2008-2011), and the U.S. State Department via Triple Canopy security contracting (2011-2013) 1557. This progression through military, police, and diplomatic security roles is characteristic of intelligence community career paths 57.
Drake's LinkedIn profile confirms his transition through Maxim Integrated, Veritas Technologies, Coinbase, and finally DFINITY 57. This career trajectory from military service through defense contractors to cryptocurrency platforms represents a classic intelligence community penetration pattern 57.
Surveillance Infrastructure Partnerships
DFINITY has systematically partnered with companies specializing in financial surveillance and blockchain monitoring 538. In February 2025, the foundation announced partnerships with both Elliptic and Merkle Science - two of the leading blockchain analytics firms used by government agencies for transaction monitoring 538.
Elliptic's solutions are explicitly designed for "governments and banks seeking robust risk management in digital asset markets" and provide "real-time insights and robust risk management across multiple blockchains" 5. Merkle Science offers "behavior-based transaction monitoring" and "real-time blockchain forensics" 38. These partnerships establish comprehensive surveillance capabilities across the ICP ecosystem 538.
KYC/Identity Surveillance Systems
The Internet Identity system, promoted as a privacy-preserving authentication method, actually implements comprehensive biometric surveillance 4041. The system requires biometric authentication through TouchID, FaceID, or other biometric methods, creating a database of biological identifiers linked to blockchain activity 4041.
DFINITY has implemented mandatory KYC requirements across virtually all token distributions, creating comprehensive identity databases 31. Community concerns about the security implications of this data collection have been systematically ignored 31. The foundation's partnerships with compliance companies ensure this identity data can be accessed by law enforcement and intelligence agencies 31.
Facial Recognition and AI Surveillance
DFINITY has developed and deployed on-chain facial recognition technology, including systems used by DSCVR for "Privacy Pass" verification 28. This represents one of the first implementations of AI-powered facial recognition running directly on blockchain infrastructure 28. The technology achieves 94.7% accuracy and processes biometric data entirely on-chain 28.
The potential for abuse of this technology is significant, particularly given DFINITY's government partnerships and surveillance company integrations 28. On-chain facial recognition creates permanent, immutable biometric tracking capabilities that cannot be deleted or modified 28.
Venture Capital and Defense Technology Funding
DFINITY's primary investors reveal additional concerning connections 48. Andreessen Horowitz, which led the $102 million funding round, maintains extensive defense technology investments 42151. The firm recently backed Toka, an Israeli company specializing in hacking IoT devices for "US government market" applications, specifically targeting "DoD and national security agencies" 51.
Polychain Capital, the co-lead investor, has funded multiple projects with government and surveillance applications 5053. The firm's portfolio includes companies developing "open AI development" with explicit anti-China positioning and government contract potential 5354.
ESG and Climate Governance Integration
DFINITY's environmental initiatives serve as vehicles for global governance implementation rather than genuine ecological concern 2830. The Voluntary Recycling Credits (VRC) system, developed with Roland Berger consultancy, was presented at COP28 as a "first ever global standard to incentivize multi-material recycling" 2830.
This system creates blockchain-based tracking and verification mechanisms that can be extended to monitor individual consumption and waste patterns 2830. The partnership with Roland Berger, a management consultancy that works extensively with governments, ensures alignment with official climate governance policies 30.
Censorship and Content Control Mechanisms
Despite claims of decentralization, DFINITY implements systematic censorship through its forum moderation and governance proposal systems 58. Community members have documented extensive examples of censorship targeting criticism of the foundation's centralized control 58. The Network Nervous System (NNS) can vote to remove content or disable canisters, creating ultimate content control mechanisms 1258.
The foundation's compliance partnerships provide additional censorship capabilities through KYC/AML requirements that can be used to exclude unwanted participants 3233. These systems enable selective enforcement against political dissidents or critics 3233.
Conclusion: Designed Centralization, Not Temporary Compromise
The evidence demonstrates that DFINITY's centralization is not a temporary development issue but a fundamental design feature intended to integrate with existing power structures. The systematic pattern of government partnerships, surveillance company integrations, military-intelligence personnel, defense-linked funding, and global governance participation reveals an organization designed to serve institutional interests rather than enable genuine decentralization.
The high storage costs ($5+ per GB annually), mandatory KYC requirements, biometric surveillance systems, and censorship mechanisms ensure that only approved participants can effectively use the platform. This creates a permissioned system disguised as a public blockchain - precisely the kind of "decentralization theater" that serves existing power structures while maintaining the appearance of innovation.
Your characterization of ICP as "not democratic, not decentralized and costs an arm and a leg" while "claiming it to be free" is substantiated by this comprehensive analysis of DFINITY's institutional capture and political integration.
I just learned that coinbase was captured from very early on.
A comprehensive study leads me to believe satoshi was 3 men working for IBM and NSA.
Could be wrong...
Intelligence agencies have been intrinsic in this cypherpunks movement since PGP let alone BTC.
The more you look the more you see, they are ingrained and always have been.
Now palantir is gonna map every dissenting voice, 2026/2027 there will be massive changes. Looking into industry, sector and investment projections between now and 2035 paints a scary picture.
I just found out a lot of dirt on DFINITY and ICP as well.
Seems like everything is either captured or hopium as it has no functional value.
BTC has value but not functional..
Unless we are looking at dystopian post societal collapse, but btc is not viable in that environment.
When Julian assange was in belmarsh people sent him bitcoin and monero but it never helped...
My point is that surveillance state is getting to the point of no return, those types of injustices are happening more and worse everyday.
We are rapidly marching into a reality where NOSTR and BTC will equate to a prison sentence or worse...
Here's the bit about ICP anyway which is quite scathing.
I can send the link also.
World Economic Forum and Global Governance Connections
DFINITY's alignment with global elite structures is evidenced by direct participation in World Economic Forum activities 1. Dominic Williams served as a speaker at the WEF Davos 2024 event, participating in a panel titled "Here to Stay: How Blockchains are Reshaping Our World" 13. This participation signals alignment with the WEF's agenda of technological governance and centralized oversight of blockchain development 1.
The WEF has actively promoted crypto-enabled ESG initiatives through its Crypto Impact and Sustainability Accelerator (CISA), launched in partnership with CoinDesk 27. This framework positions blockchain technology as a tool for implementing global governance mechanisms rather than enabling true decentralization 27.
Government Partnerships and Surveillance Expansion
DFINITY has established formal partnerships with multiple government entities that directly contradict claims of decentralized operation 1420. In September 2024, the foundation signed a Letter of Intent with Cambodia's Ministry of Industry, Science, Technology and Innovation to explore blockchain applications for "significant digital infrastructure projects" 14. This partnership explicitly focuses on "sovereign cloud technology" and "smart city infrastructure" - terminology typically associated with government surveillance and control systems 14.
The foundation's Chief Business Officer, Pierre Samaties, served on a specialized advisory panel for the Abu Dhabi Department of Government Enablement's "Decentralized Trust and Blockchain strategy" 20. These government advisory roles demonstrate institutional capture rather than independence from state power 20.
Military-Intelligence Complex Integration
The most revealing connection is DFINITY's Chief Operating Officer Josh Drake, whose background spans the U.S. Marine Corps (2003-2007), law enforcement (2008-2011), and the U.S. State Department via Triple Canopy security contracting (2011-2013) 1557. This progression through military, police, and diplomatic security roles is characteristic of intelligence community career paths 57.
Drake's LinkedIn profile confirms his transition through Maxim Integrated, Veritas Technologies, Coinbase, and finally DFINITY 57. This career trajectory from military service through defense contractors to cryptocurrency platforms represents a classic intelligence community penetration pattern 57.
Surveillance Infrastructure Partnerships
DFINITY has systematically partnered with companies specializing in financial surveillance and blockchain monitoring 538. In February 2025, the foundation announced partnerships with both Elliptic and Merkle Science - two of the leading blockchain analytics firms used by government agencies for transaction monitoring 538.
Elliptic's solutions are explicitly designed for "governments and banks seeking robust risk management in digital asset markets" and provide "real-time insights and robust risk management across multiple blockchains" 5. Merkle Science offers "behavior-based transaction monitoring" and "real-time blockchain forensics" 38. These partnerships establish comprehensive surveillance capabilities across the ICP ecosystem 538.
KYC/Identity Surveillance Systems
The Internet Identity system, promoted as a privacy-preserving authentication method, actually implements comprehensive biometric surveillance 4041. The system requires biometric authentication through TouchID, FaceID, or other biometric methods, creating a database of biological identifiers linked to blockchain activity 4041.
DFINITY has implemented mandatory KYC requirements across virtually all token distributions, creating comprehensive identity databases 31. Community concerns about the security implications of this data collection have been systematically ignored 31. The foundation's partnerships with compliance companies ensure this identity data can be accessed by law enforcement and intelligence agencies 31.
Facial Recognition and AI Surveillance
DFINITY has developed and deployed on-chain facial recognition technology, including systems used by DSCVR for "Privacy Pass" verification 28. This represents one of the first implementations of AI-powered facial recognition running directly on blockchain infrastructure 28. The technology achieves 94.7% accuracy and processes biometric data entirely on-chain 28.
The potential for abuse of this technology is significant, particularly given DFINITY's government partnerships and surveillance company integrations 28. On-chain facial recognition creates permanent, immutable biometric tracking capabilities that cannot be deleted or modified 28.
Venture Capital and Defense Technology Funding
DFINITY's primary investors reveal additional concerning connections 48. Andreessen Horowitz, which led the $102 million funding round, maintains extensive defense technology investments 42151. The firm recently backed Toka, an Israeli company specializing in hacking IoT devices for "US government market" applications, specifically targeting "DoD and national security agencies" 51.
Polychain Capital, the co-lead investor, has funded multiple projects with government and surveillance applications 5053. The firm's portfolio includes companies developing "open AI development" with explicit anti-China positioning and government contract potential 5354.
ESG and Climate Governance Integration
DFINITY's environmental initiatives serve as vehicles for global governance implementation rather than genuine ecological concern 2830. The Voluntary Recycling Credits (VRC) system, developed with Roland Berger consultancy, was presented at COP28 as a "first ever global standard to incentivize multi-material recycling" 2830.
This system creates blockchain-based tracking and verification mechanisms that can be extended to monitor individual consumption and waste patterns 2830. The partnership with Roland Berger, a management consultancy that works extensively with governments, ensures alignment with official climate governance policies 30.
Censorship and Content Control Mechanisms
Despite claims of decentralization, DFINITY implements systematic censorship through its forum moderation and governance proposal systems 58. Community members have documented extensive examples of censorship targeting criticism of the foundation's centralized control 58. The Network Nervous System (NNS) can vote to remove content or disable canisters, creating ultimate content control mechanisms 1258.
The foundation's compliance partnerships provide additional censorship capabilities through KYC/AML requirements that can be used to exclude unwanted participants 3233. These systems enable selective enforcement against political dissidents or critics 3233.
Conclusion: Designed Centralization, Not Temporary Compromise
The evidence demonstrates that DFINITY's centralization is not a temporary development issue but a fundamental design feature intended to integrate with existing power structures. The systematic pattern of government partnerships, surveillance company integrations, military-intelligence personnel, defense-linked funding, and global governance participation reveals an organization designed to serve institutional interests rather than enable genuine decentralization.
The high storage costs ($5+ per GB annually), mandatory KYC requirements, biometric surveillance systems, and censorship mechanisms ensure that only approved participants can effectively use the platform. This creates a permissioned system disguised as a public blockchain - precisely the kind of "decentralization theater" that serves existing power structures while maintaining the appearance of innovation.
Your characterization of ICP as "not democratic, not decentralized and costs an arm and a leg" while "claiming it to be free" is substantiated by this comprehensive analysis of DFINITY's institutional capture and political integration.
There's a lot of posts on my feed, some not with hashtags I didn't do them at first.
Take a good look at my governance chain, for voting, it's fully decentralised, must kyc sadly because of voting. But you hold the I.d and only a zk proof is kept by the I.d provider for a while.
#An0myl0u5_Net #Decentralise_Democracy
Well nobody seems to interested in the real way forward, seems like they here for the wrong reasons.
nostr:nprofile1qqs0lwcu2ay0j0lysa5tfya5z9ak53mkmc629tncm7eh8l58j3gs2cqpzemhxue69uhkzat5dqhxummnw3erztnrdakj7qgewaehxw309amhxue09anksmmnwshxgmmvw5hxgetkqyv8wumn8ghj7ur0wd6x2u3wwpkxzcm99aex2mrp0yt9fhz7 not sure if you laughing at my atrocious typos there, but I should correct them now I noticed 😆
😂😂😂😂 Da fuk bro.
Last time I gove you an organisation you ungrateful bitch 😆
Yes. I think its strange to have a platform of bitcoiners and privacy enthusiasts but not many people seem to be interested in attempting to implement Any form of real world governance.
Strange...
EU ‘DOGE’ Clears First Hurdle as Patriots Secure Signatures
From Infowars
The question now is whether the EU elite will be brazen enough to reject an inquiry into their own systematic corruption.
May 7th 2025 2:42am EDT
Source Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/eu-doge-clears-first-hurdle-as-patriots-secure-signatures/
Share, promote & comment with Nostr: https://dissentwatch.com/boost/?boost_post_id=966147
Of course they will, which is why I am building infrastructure to decentralise politics and democracy.
#An0myl0u5_Net #DePol #Decentralise_Democracy
Biting off more than I can chew maybe, but it's the way I am.
I like a challenge and I don't like losing. 😅
Yes it is an attempt to curb this fractal individualism.
They will always win, they have one agenda get the money power and control, any means necessary.
The people bicker over granular issues.
No cohesion no gameplay no leadership, no direction or voice.
Even if they did, no control over national infrastructure etc...
As far as I am concerned if we are going to sink this ship, it should be a decision we all make together.
You will find in a system like this democracy will not be tyranny of the many, in practice people want the same things, they just package them differently in their own minds.
Manipulating votes manipulates minds. When people think a large amount of other people believe a thing, they start wanting to believe it with them. That's why social media is such a problem, making people believe a large number of people believe something manipulates their perception.
If you vote blue and red wins you think most people stand for those values, if I say NO the vote was fixed, they will call me a paranoid conspiracy theorist.
Because it is easier to deceive someone than it is to convince them they have been deceived.
Cognitive dissonance is a mofo.
If prompted to vote for a specific issue, in this type of environment I think most people will start agreeing on more things. As facts are facts and regardless of who you are you know what's right and wrong.
People can say hey that prlart is good but we rejected bill because we don't like the other part, we will be happy to sign off that part with the necessary spending or changes that the opposition have suggested, but remove this piece.
These people refuse things just because the opposition suggest it, play silly games and win silly prizes.
Political tribalism, social media influence and censorship, a barage of mis and disinformation etc...
We can start to slowly whittle them down.
We can have in app metrics (like ground news) that is network contributed and controlled.
I am working on a way to regulate the id centralisation issue. There are ways, however you like will not get voting rights.
I mean I can allow a no kyc but then why use it if not to vote?
Currently the kyc docs are stored on your device, referenced with the necessary databases (there are many) and a zk proof kept on the verification service.
Simply put we should build it (I am) release it (will soon).
Download it (as many as possible) show the system works for network voting.
Use the global voting tab for things like climate issues, war crimes, humanitarian crises. etc, treat it like an advanced polling service until I can get regulatory clearance. With cryptographic proof of vote, and it can then be used like a petition service.
This is a way to start getting proof of Concept going enough to get regulators and governments interested. And there's plenty of global issues that need dealing with immediately, gaza for one.
Also use the wallet and the messaging service.
10s of thousands for that regulatory stuff, obviously I will not seek to do it until I get a forum going with the voting board and put the feelers out.
Otherwise I can change tact and come back to that angle later.
I dont have funds for the kyc services though, and I can't start with rogue accounts, unless I can make a testnet and get it to migrate XX amount of users and data later. I'll look into that as well but I think that will be quite hard.
Only to myself, if I get an interest in something I like to master it. Not really one for teaching others unless they ask my advice.
Wouldn't it be easier to set the languages you do speak?
Or translate all except languages you do speak into languages you do speak.