Would be interesting to compare the answers from different LLMs to this question
Deepseek for instance
Grok’s answer here I think in some part shows that the truth will eventually overcome fiat economist nonsense 
Discussion
I asked the same question to Deep Seek. pretty much the same talking points, but it added a concern about energy consumption.
"The relationship between Bitcoin and human rights is a complex and evolving topic. Bitcoin, as a decentralized digital currency, has several characteristics that can intersect with human rights issues:
1. **Financial Inclusion**: Bitcoin can provide access to financial services for people who are excluded from traditional banking systems. This can be particularly important in regions where governments control or restrict access to financial services as a means of suppressing dissent or controlling populations.
2. **Censorship Resistance**: Bitcoin transactions are difficult to censor due to the decentralized nature of the blockchain. This can be crucial for activists and journalists operating under repressive regimes, as it allows them to receive funds without government interference.
3. **Privacy and Anonymity**: While Bitcoin transactions are recorded on a public ledger, the identities of the parties involved are not inherently tied to their wallet addresses. This can offer a degree of privacy for individuals who may be at risk if their financial transactions were exposed.
4. **Protection from Inflation and Confiscation**: In countries experiencing hyperinflation or where governments have a history of confiscating assets, Bitcoin can serve as a store of value and a means of protecting wealth.
5. **Empowerment**: Bitcoin can empower individuals by giving them control over their own money without the need for intermediaries. This can be particularly empowering in situations where individuals face discrimination or are subject to the whims of corrupt financial institutions.
However, there are also concerns and challenges:
1. **Volatility**: The price of Bitcoin is highly volatile, which can pose risks for individuals relying on it for financial stability.
2. **Regulatory Challenges**: Governments may seek to regulate or ban Bitcoin, which can limit its effectiveness as a tool for human rights.
3. **Illicit Use**: The same features that make Bitcoin useful for human rights activists can also make it attractive for illicit activities, which can lead to increased scrutiny and regulation.
4. **Technical Barriers**: The use of Bitcoin requires a certain level of technical knowledge, which can be a barrier for some individuals.
5. **Energy Consumption**: The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining has raised concerns, which could have indirect implications for human rights, particularly in regions affected by climate change.
In summary, Bitcoin has the potential to support human rights by providing financial autonomy, privacy, and resistance to censorship. However, its effectiveness is influenced by regulatory environments, technical accessibility, and the broader socio-economic context. As with any technology, the impact of Bitcoin on human rights is not inherently positive or negative but depends on how it is used and the circumstances in which it is deployed."
Me asking Claude:
> What is the relationship between Bitcoin and human rights? Talk it out for five prompts before making a final answer.
(I reply with "." five times, then: "Let's answer the original question now")
Based on our detailed analysis, Bitcoin's relationship with human rights is fundamentally one of expanded individual financial sovereignty, but with important limitations and tradeoffs.
The key positive impacts on human rights include:
- Providing financial services to the unbanked and those under repressive regimes
- Enabling cross-border aid and remittances with reduced interference
- Offering protection against currency devaluation and asset seizure
- Supporting privacy and resistance to financial surveillance
- Demonstrating alternatives to state-controlled financial systems
However, significant challenges limit its human rights benefits:
- Technical barriers exclude many vulnerable populations
- Blockchain transparency creates surveillance risks
- Price volatility can harm those who can least afford losses
- Environmental impacts disproportionately affect vulnerable communities
- Reduced ability to enforce sanctions against human rights violators
The relationship is therefore nuanced - Bitcoin is not a panacea for human rights challenges, but rather a powerful tool that can support human rights work when used appropriately. Its greatest contribution may be challenging traditional financial power structures that can enable human rights abuses, while its greatest limitation is the tension between individual financial freedom and collective social goods.
The technology's human rights impact ultimately depends heavily on how it is used and regulated, with the potential for both positive and negative effects on different aspects of human rights.