Given what we've seen, there's no doubt in my mind that the size of the bitcoin block needs to be reduced to 300 kb.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Let's do it

1kb

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ okay bro

Transactions must be strictly monetary that transfer value. There is no need blocks to be full at the moment. Demand will grow exponentially. We are at the moment with Bitcoin when the Internet was using Dial Ups and BBSs. And now we have fiber optics GBit/s connections and new AI data centeres work as the largest supercomputers. Demand for Bitcoin will grow exponentially with more and more people adopting it. We just need to keep it money and not shitcoin memes, nfts and spam bloat.

And with this argument we don’t need to worry about second about data on the blockchain πŸ‘πŸ»

Because monetary data will always be higher valued than arbitrary data. So blockspace will once become so expensive no one will store data on the blockchain.

Fees are the best filter we can ever have

Higly retarded take.

Filters + fees is better than just fees.

Are the inscriptions outpirced? Let me answer for you because I doubt you are able to. No.

nostr:nevent1qqsxx68hdxeyftg95xyaanwknccpd7s98hh3fxs6j6tqdd9cskh0tzgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgnwaehxw309ahkvenrdpskjm3wwp6kytcr6qfzy

Filters don’t work! That’s why we still have spam mails 50 years later πŸ™„πŸ™„πŸ™„

But hey, on bitcoin filters will work in a fluffy magic rainbow way so it will definitely work 🌈 πŸ¦„

Inscription are still a thing because block space is still cheap and not completely filled with monetary transactions

Im out of this stupid discussion

Highly retarded take.

Filters never need to work 100%.

The excuse about inscriptions is pathetic.

There are trade-offs to this. Can you explain the rationale?

Say goodbye to self-custody then.

It would be totally safe to run 4M blocks today with storage and bandwidth growth. All monetary transactions enabling 25 tx/s. SegWit's discount is a problem.