indeed. When things are left undefined and left to the imagination to those who are "supposedly" execute the law is very dangerous! We know who will be left as collateral!
Hate speech is clearly not specific enough.
What must be prohibited is speech that jeopardizes the physical integrity of others. There must be a clear incitation to physical violence for it to not benefit the free speech label. Think Radio Mille Collines in Rwanda in 1994 for example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_T%C3%A9l%C3%A9vision_Libre_des_Mille_Collines
Discussion
No replies yet.