Nostr Web Client

I am a bit lost!...

In one hand people say they want "FREEDOM of SPEECH" but when they hear something that disagree their belief system, their conditioning or something that they are not accustomed to or something unnatural to them or not align with their values, you tagged it as "HATE SPEECH"?

You cannot ask one thing and aboloshed the other because you disagree with them. The beauty of FREE SPEECH is to have DIVERSE OPINION. It means whether you agree with my OPINION or NOT, it is still my RIGHT.

So you cannot use the HATE SPEECH only when it suits you!

Can you DEFINE what do you consider as HATE SPEECH because I cannot find it on the legal system! Or have I missed something?

Tell me, are we really EXERCISING OUR FREE SPEECH or are we EXERCISING our BIASES?

Thoughts #nostr?

Cheers,

M💋

#freespeech #introductions #grownostr #lifelessons #lifecoach

KaliYuga 1y ago

Hate speech is clearly not specific enough.

What must be prohibited is speech that jeopardizes the physical integrity of others. There must be a clear incitation to physical violence for it to not benefit the free speech label. Think Radio Mille Collines in Rwanda in 1994 for example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_T%C3%A9l%C3%A9vision_Libre_des_Mille_Collines

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Lady Mae - Growth Teacher 1y ago

indeed. When things are left undefined and left to the imagination to those who are "supposedly" execute the law is very dangerous! We know who will be left as collateral!