I read all your posts. I know when people come from an angle that is so unique that it is pure alpha. Thanks for that.

So I guess you will draw your own conclusions.

1. What we know is that some scholars recommended direct state attacks on Monero.

2. Almost all CEX run or ran fractional reserves

3. Once exposed and maxed out, the system reacted with new regulation forcing CEX into delistings reducing liquidity.

4. Ever since most liquidity has been pulled Monero is rising (which is counter intuitive, but makes sense if we assume the fractional reserve pressure fades)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

1) It seems Monero breaks the Travel-Rule / AML perimeter.

- The FATF Travel Rule and national KYC/AML regimes require VASPs (exchanges) to know sender/receiver and screen flows.

- Monero breaks this at scale.

2) Large exchanges are forced to use chain-analytics services (TRM, Chainalysis, etc.) and they can't score XMR beyond crude heuristics.

3) Large exchanges need access to perimeter governance: banks, card networks, licenses, clouds, app stores, and analytics partners to stay compliant.

- For them, potential bad press (e.g. ransomware narratives) is bad risk/reward ratio. One DOJ press release can nuke your bank lines.

- Major exchanges delist privacy coins just before/after key license applications, banking renewals, or geographic expansions.

- For large exchanges, it is high compliance drag, low monetization.

- Regulators probably instructed large exchanges to delist Monero because they need them to derisk and keep tracking everything else.

- The remaining small exchanges can keep tracking Monero inflows/outflows. They are unlikely to delist it as well. Tier-2/3 venues still keep the leakage measurable and surveillable (KYC edges, withdrawal patterns, device/browser telemetry, fiat touchpoints, etc).

- If any of the small exchanges blow up, or lose banks, card networks, licenses, clouds, app stores, and analytics partners, it's much easier to stomach than Binance/Kraken/Coinbase becoming toxic.

- Removing Monero from the default rails also slows adoption.

4) Small exchanges are unlikely to be allowed to delist it.

- Shutting all doors would push flows fully P2P/offshore where telemetry is worse.

- Small exchanges will be left as a controlled-opposition valve. Leaving a sanctioned “privacy outlet” in a few fenced gardens reduces pressure for broader resistance. People think the option still exists, so they don’t escalate.

- Smaller exchanges have looser banking/processing (or crypto-in/crypto-out only) and earn high-margin fees from Monero users and OTC desks.

- They just want to make the privacy choice costly, slow, and niche.

5) Most likely case for the next ~2 years - keep Monero on niche venues but remove fiat pairs in US/EU/UK; crypto-only pairs remain; heavy geofencing; withdrawals throttled.

6) Signals if they decide to delist it from smaller exchanges:

- Fiat pair removals first, then full delists.

- Withdrawal min/max and delays tighten “for compliance”.

- Geofencing expansions (more countries blocked from Monero markets).

- App-store policy tweaks framed as anti-CSAM/AML (collateral damage to privacy wallets).

That's the playbook.

Doesn’t lightning break this rule too?

Yes, for the same structural reasons Monero does, but via different mechanics.

1) Traceability

- Monero: Privacy-by-default blockchain hides sender, receiver, and amount (ring signatures, stealth addresses, confidential tx).

- Lightning: Base-chain UTXOs are visible, but channel-level payments are invisible; hops see only adjacent peers.

2) Data transmission

- Monero: No field for Travel-Rule data.

- Lightning: No field or standard for originator/beneficiary info.

3) Counterparty identification

- Monero: Impossible.

- Lightning: Practically impossible without deanonymizing channels and nodes.

4) Regulatory outcome

- Monero: Non-compliant by design.

- Lightning: Non-compliant for any cross-VASP (exchange) payment routed over public Lightning channels.

The thing that works as digital cash: shadowbanned.

The thing that doesn't: has ETFs and widespread institutional adoption.

Take notice.

> Ever since most liquidity has been pulled Monero is rising (which is counter intuitive

Not sure if it’s counterintuitive. Can be explained with the increase of monetary premium. When you make a commodity difficult to obtain, you effectively give it additional monetary premium. Illegal drugs and items almost in all cases get more expensive rather than cheaper. Currently there’s stigma around Monero, but it’s not outright made illegal. If Monero gets delisted by all exchanges, my guess it will shot up in fiat value much more than today. Same could happen to Bitcoin if put in similar circumstances. Enforcement doesn’t remove demand, it amplifies it by constraining supply.

Another valid perspective.