I don’t think we are going to see eye to eye on approach here, but, in the case of the honestly intentioned but uninformed…

If you just open with “it’s the Jews”, IMO, the one that DOESN’T ask questions is the threat because he is just agreeing to A) sound smart or B) gain your approval, but will actually sell you out like the guy that switches jersies when the other team gains the lead.

The one that asks questions in earnest is the only one that deserves to hear the bigger picture, and the line of Socratic thinking is an easy path from “the race Marxist’s and those that fund them”.

“Well who funds them?”

“Well, the Clinton’s, Soros family, debeers, etc”

“Why do they do this?”

[philosophical conversation]

“But where do these ideas come from?”

“In the west, plato. The west evolved past this via Aristotle. But Plato got his ideas from the east, such as the Indians and early Jews. The Jews never evolved past this social point and resisted updating at all costs, were expelled from their homeland because of it, and then stubbornly clung to an Iron Age religion all the way to the modern era. Being in a weird position of being ‘domestic foreigners’ they developed expertise in institutional capture as a survival tactic. It worked for them and they slowly took major positions of power in all western institutions over the course of the last 500 years, but mostly reaching critical mass over the last 100, and reaching a tipping point at the time of the world wars”.

By the time you’ve gotten all the way here, if you haven’t been able to vette whether or not to trust this person with all this information by the time you get all the way to THIS point, then there is a YOU problem.