Nostr Web Client

I’d also like a WoT-lookalike that uses content instead of follows to map users by topic proximity if anyone volunteers to make it happen. Then you can feed it a topic and it gives you sources and sources lead to content even if it’s not in the same place.

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 7mo ago 💬 3

the word index i've been building could probably help you find this kind of clustering at some primitive level of precision, was quite funny trying to figure out how to make it language agnostic, found a nice library for segmenting unicode UTF-8 text that did a pretty good job, then i just had to filter out common things like filename extensions and nostr entities and whatnot

i gotta finish building that thing... i'm actually done with the draft now and really just need to hook it up to a query endpoint

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Silberengel 7mo ago

Yeah, it's the sort of service that saves client devs from having to think through the filters and algorithms.

Or they just use Aedile's topicGraph component. 😉

MichaelJ 7mo ago 💬 4

Are you promising Aedile features? 👀

Silberengel 7mo ago

😁 No pressure.

Silberengel 7mo ago

Something I was thinking about is starting with highly-prepared searches and then expanding iteratively, if they reclick the search button.

Like an LLM does, but with no chat. Just keep looking deeper and broader until you've exhausted the possibilities.

MichaelJ 7mo ago 💬 4

Ooh I do like that. Like the next page of Google, but smarter.

Silberengel 7mo ago 💬 2

Could have an auto-iterate toggle and there's already a Cancel button, to stop searches underway, and a progress bar. The final stage could be full-text on all active relays or something ridiculous. 😂

We could call that the "Great time to grab a snack and a coffee." Iteration.

MichaelJ 7mo ago

I'm trying to corral LLMs into their lane enough in my workflows that I can turn them loose and grab a snack.

Silberengel 7mo ago

😂

semisol 7mo ago

that won’t even be necessary though

Silberengel 7mo ago 💬 2

If they use your server, no, since you do it on the backend, but we promised that Alexandria would be worth running, even with a crappy relay. There's a lot that can be done with normal computer science.

semisol 7mo ago

Trying to make it work for crappy search is not worth it

Silberengel 7mo ago

Never sleep. 🤙🏻

Silberengel 7mo ago

SEARCH HARDER, BABY

Silberengel 7mo ago

Yeah, Just one bar, that isn't an LLM, but you can say "longform article from liminal from last week about LLMs" and ta-da!

MichaelJ 7mo ago 💬 2

Semantic search ftw

Silberengel 7mo ago

It's actually not that difficult, but nobody has built it yet and I want to find stuff. I'm so tired of not being able to find "bible KJV" because the search is too retarded to normalize and prepare the filter properly and is like,

Yo, I found no "bible KJV". 🤙🏻

Okaaaay, but you found a "KJV Bible" right? 🤦🏻‍♀️

The worst is when people are like, Just ask am LLM. Ugh. It's like four lines of code, you morons.

MichaelJ 7mo ago

I don't want to have to have a full conversation with a robot just to find an article.

Silberengel 7mo ago

☝🏻💯🫂