Wow who knew people here were so passionate about reading detailed research studies.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02223-9.epdf?sharing_token=xpPQ8LpEirdMWZpwra3esdRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0MTnVt_Yzm2YDkmKtSZJOysYZlROr0ymfAdj9yPHH8bMVWpKjhPzPeMT8zTG9DpNMmnfRfOqNqOH8PhwI2X9sxfHMa-Tpawl-dyIWq9WdTUO2lqDJWIHLoFK3aG5AGi1YgXuQnzd7H9Exq7sq6Wvt58todFdPPylCoAJ2_Xd4Gajw%3D%3D&tracking_referrer=www.cnn.com&mibextid=Zxz2cZ nostr:note1nzs72207zdeh4dmddg3rqg0ku7y50rpjkf60n60x5an9wpm90wvqk3uhun

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I don’t think they would even understand the research study, if they bother reading in the first place πŸ™„

I'm one of those people. It's enlightening to follow a bogus headline back to the original study that is usually about a completely separate topic. Now THAT'S enterainment!