No much meaning and too much free time, people do not understand what's really important.
Everybody should just let everyone else live their live and think for themself.
Discussion
a truly libertarian answer, love to see it!
I think _most_ people are, TBH. However, the conflict arises when one is asked to change one's language to accommodate others, or accept unfair sports competition to accommodate others, or accept fearful prison conditions to accommodate others, etc. A philosophy of 'live & let-live' doesn't really cover these situations.
In theory, we would not get to those cases with the "Live and let live" ideology. (I would hope)
However let's see your examples, I understand what you are saying, let's see what could be done.
- I think that regarding the language issue, nobody is gonna change my language because I would not like to have connections with people who would impose me to do that
- Regarding the sport competition I would change the sport if needed
- Regarding the prison a whole different story, I'm not going to express there, I don't know the argument enough
My point is that now they are living out of attention, attention that I'm not going to give them, without it, there would not be so much FOMO around those arguments.