Dear Bitcoin Maxis
How do you argue objectively against #Crypto marketing blabla. The have all the fancy crypto bells and whistles. I came across a post that one of this 💩 coins even solved the Blockchain trillemma.
What do you exactly ask these people do corner. "Brandolini's Law", also known as the "Bullshit Asymmetry Principle" is a big problem for me. #asknoster
Let them read this nostr:note157ujzmxxnwl20lcgq282z77nymgnddpsww7h9fggr4jlhp99lasqx283cl 🤠
Don't know that one thanks
✌️
Also a good one that might work for some people 😅
https://medium.datadriveninvestor.com/do-not-buy-bitcoin-75da73226530
Never try to argue with a retard, they'll drag you down to their level and beat you up with their experience.
His second point doesn't even make sense. Better just to ignore or at most reply with a "retard wojak" and move on
I mean, he's either a paid shill that denies being paid or an insider/vc looking for exit liquidity. You can't have an honest discussion with someone who's not honest.
The bulletpoint arguments are targeted to an audience that won't dig dipper than bulletpoints on a post.
The real objective is written right there: we are a top 40 coin in MC without listings on any major shitcoin casino. Imagine how much we could pump if we got listed - and how much you'll be able to make out of dumping through said pump
Absolutely. I think he only wants to shill his bags. Ok you could argue we do the same when we frantically talk about BTC.
I don't want to argue with him, but to show bystanders the difference, the truth.
Thank you to mention the Brandolini's Law. Did not know the expression even when I know the idea behind it. That false news is easy to print and spread. But hard to debunk effectively.
I think the only thing is pointing out well proven facts which are easy to remember and are true, while contradicting with the desinformation.
This strategy has not the goal to help every soul. But at least an attempt, to help the sceptical readers to see it is bullshit fast.
I think when people with the knowledge and will to think critically are able to figure out, that information is not worth reading or sharing, a lot of damage is already prevented. The fundamentalists, we can leave with their believes I think. They are not that attractive to suck in the attention of the masses.
Ignore them.
Usually I do. But when a public figure is shitcoining I want to have a discussion for others to read. Not to convince the shitcoiners. I'm also a full time bitcoin educator, so sometimes I feel obliged to.
He’s a scammer and he knows he is talking shit. How does 10 second block time could ever increase decentralization? Call him out but don’t discuss his bullshit.
