Oh, I undestand now, thanks for explaining it 🫂
Yes, I understand that pont but mine is not like "reject all change"
The point is:
- change is dangerous, there are more ways to degrade the current functioning order than ways to improve it. Is a pure statistical fact of complex sustems
- but not changeing also is dangerous, you miss the chance to adopt better ideas.
The common progressive mistake is to think that all change is for good, and they most of the time throw the baby with the bath water
The common conservative mistake is to not change at all.
For me the wise course of action is to mimic nature, who is wise enough to know that some things are too complex to just "solve for X" and apply that one-size-fits-all solution.
Natures try everithing, and keeps what works in the long run. No answer is absolute.
We can do the same by allowing people to try differen rates of change in their lives from 0% (amish I.E.) to 100%(progresive trying new social roles and practices). But IMO you are mistaken in asking everybody to join your journey into the unknown long term consequienses of messing with complex social institutions, the same kind of mistake a conservative woud do by asking everybody to not try and do new stuff