What fucking enemies dude? I bet half of the people you're talking about are from countries we are allied with.
"It was not enough, Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion emphasized, merely to conspire “to subvert by force the government of our country” by recruiting troops, procuring maps, and drawing up plans. Conspiring to levy war was distinct from actually levying war."
https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-iii/clauses/39
"A citizen intellectually or emotionally may favor the enemy and harbor sympathies or convictions disloyal to this country’s policy or interest, but, so long as he commits no act of aid and comfort to the enemy, there is no treason."
What you're talking about is not treason, it's conspiracy. Unless you can define this enemy you're speaking of, it doesn't fit the definition of treason, you're just making a boogeyman.
Again. There is no evidence I could potentially present that will get you to believe the things I'm saying and realistically I don't care to waste my time trying.
I don't care about that justice's opinion.
And I don't care about your opinion of his opinion either.
Bc, like illegal immigrants, you don't respect the rule of law. You don't have principles, you just point and say "this is wrong, that is right" arbitrarily and use that to justify violence. I don't respect the law myself, but the government HAS to follow it, otherwise we live in a monarchy and the rules only apply to citizens.
A judge's opinion is not the rule of law.
Illegal immigrants don't deserve respect.
Invasion and treason justify violence.
Pretty simple really.
"A judge" its literally the "opinion" of the supreme court.
Invasion and tresson justify violence. Your definition of those words doesn't meet the standard of the highest law of the land. If the supreme courts opinion isn't valid, then I assert that you are being treasonous and all violence against you is permitted, because we're just using arbitrary definitions.
Nope. You're conflating judgement and governance.
lol look how quickly you've decided that violence against me is warranted and I'm a random citizen. Funny how that works.
I think I'll take this as you conceding your argument because you've now advocated for the force of the American government to be levied on me as a tactic of debate.
We're done here. Bye.
See, you don't like when an arbitrary definition of treason is applied to you. Lol I just used your own logic against you and it triggered you so bad you rage quit
