Makes a lot of sense.
Discussion
How’s that?
I can’t just give you the answer. You need to conduct your own research.
Feels like a setup for a banana joke. It’s a trap!
Agreed
No no. It’s legit. A theory, but legit nonetheless.
How exactly? How does one know?
….
nostr:note18npx0564x249ewuych6wvl9r730jsxlv90lz0plddz7666xtxz6s2ss5kp
Wolf 🐺 needs to explain this more 😂
There are three ways, well there are more, but basically three ways to peel and eat an orange:
There's the man who grabs any orange off the shelf, doesn't rinse it, and bites into it to start the peeling. Rips the peel off, tosses it aside, and eats mis mahs of double and triple slices.
There's the man who carries a pocket knife, rinses it, slices off a bit, and then methodcially peels the orange. Eats a single slice at a time, savouring every bite, and grabs another.
Then there's the man that washes it, cuts the orange into perfect wedges, puts it into a container to take to work, then folds out the meat of the orange, makes sure that he doesn't get any fluid on his fingers, and then throws away the peels.
Each of these generalizations corresponds to a type of lover. The first is a voracisou/selfish lover, the second is a careful, generous, giving lover who thinks ahead and is in control, and then the third one is the type who lays out his clothes, doesn't take his socks off, and is robotic in his execution.
This is a poor summary of her hypothesis, but it's the gist.