The sad truth is that people are hoarding billions of sats but won't zap more than 21 sats.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That's not true I do 101 for some great shit

I will zap more than 21 if I have at least more than my current zap goal.

Not sad. Smart. Honestly, I would do the same. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

I hope they still zap 21 sats when it's worth 1000x as much.

I say all the time that we will look back at this time and laugh about how easily we gave away sats.

Value-4-Value... if it's worth more than 21 SATS, it will be zapped proportionately... it's not really a good idea to try to tell sovrn plebs how to spend their SATS, friend πŸ€™

Apple fucked us.

I got like $.35 from a billionaire on here once. πŸ˜‚

500 on the way. Boom. Lol

I zap my number 111

My stack of sats is tiny. 21 is still generous from me, but I recently moved up to 50 for posts I really like and removed the option for sending 3 sats which was my former lowest. Maybe don't judge other people's zaps πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™€οΈ

And if you're feeling guilty of hoarding then be generous with your own.

My theory is that most of the people here can’t afford to zap and have no disposable income. Sad, yes. Can we do anything about it, not likely. Plus people are generally greedy and only say big things without acting them out. Unless we have a larger population here, this is not likely to change. πŸΆπŸΎπŸ«‚πŸ’œ

Still the concept of zapping is solid.

In theory, yes. Not so much in practice. We are just gravitating toward legacy social media, where few famous accounts are accumulating all of the zaps, regardless of value. πŸΆπŸΎπŸ«‚πŸ«‘

Humanity. Ugh. No matter the opportunity, we’ll find a way to mismanage and exploit it.

That’s us! 🐢🐾🀣🀣🀣

Nah. Zaps are only the visible tip of the iceberg.

What if it's not about the #zap but the hops we made along the way 〽️

Es porque necesitamos sats para el fiat armageddon.

🀣