Consensual and successful gay relationships between a royal lord and underaged boys?
nostr:npub1dgqc52h68p7m2uar5yxmc2gp67rcjmlwm6yjr4xt3m4jg4k4rmdshr7aev
oh boy, just when they ran out of epstein jokes, they fire up a new pedo drama.
the article you reference gives itself away as fearporn and propaganda.
"paedophiia" is always associated with brutality. so that the two terms become identified. Could there have been consensual and successful gay relationships?
The text reads like a cheap tv show.
I don't have to tell you that the English journalists have been notorious for their lack of ethics for the last 200 years.
Discussion
nostr:npub14pa5q2kqs8ygfxuat02w88ezsle9wzwnu0meu7z2785t8rl0hhcspkxw3v nostr:npub1dgqc52h68p7m2uar5yxmc2gp67rcjmlwm6yjr4xt3m4jg4k4rmdshr7aev
you're asking a question?
Yes. My question is whether I am characterizing your position correctly. Because unless for some reason the goal is shallow and worthless sex, I don't believe gay relationships should be considered "successful", let alone gay relationships between used up old men and incompetent loser little boys.
I definitely agree with your point about brutality though. If a child gets groomed a certain way, it's entirely possible that the kid won't end up fighting sexual acts, with no physical brutality necessary.