The fella is a Phd in Computer Vision at MIT, which means that it's reasonable to assume that he knows pretty well the field of Computer Vision, which is a subset of the broader universe of Machine Learning.

Leaving aside my assumptions for a moment, the guy happens to have tens of peer reviewed papers and articles ranging from deep reinforcement learning to AI explainability. I never said that he knows to press buttons in a pythonic way (even though I assume he definitely can).

Preferences are a different matter, I respect yours.

I jumped in there only to point out my view about his work and how he approaches his interviews.

Since I was asked to report where and if the guy is competent on the matter of ML, I simply provided some references.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Appreciate the refs, will check out eventually.

My “Lex is an idiot” standpoint predominantly rests on his commentary when speaking with Bitcoiners—Alex Gladstein in particular. I haven’t listened to Lex speak to anyone else, except Eric Weinstein.

Bitcoin is a one question IQ test that AFAIK, Lex has consistently failed. (Eric Weinstein also fails this test)

Of course, there are three results of the #Bitcoin IQ test. 1. A. People who get it and are good people 1 B. People who get and are evil people (idiot) and 2. Stupid

Eventually he'll get it. I'll take a look at that interview. Frankly, I try to avoid watching stuff about bitcoin from the normie world...it usually is heavily biased by the lack of actual study of the matter.