Sure, but pure science is a process and the end “conclusions” are always open to challenges and new data from often anecdotal input. Relative to everything, we know nothing. The scientific process is important or we would only have a loud chorus of stories about everyone’s cousin’s mother-in-law.
The people who say "but the data says" and ignore the enormous amount of ambiguity and bias in *recording that data,* and the core fact that all studies and all science begins with anecdotal data and personal experience, have completely reversed the logic of science.
If you ignore direct experience that occurs with immediate temporal connection in literally 1000s of people, and then shortly thereafter in an order of magnitude more, you've not merely made a joke out of science, you've let the perception of "medical authority" override your common sense.
https://blossom.primal.net/3f438b8130095ac6676c5af33014b45ff2aab65b6da550a99320805d35cf0e34.mp4
Discussion
No replies yet.