Subnostr

When someone tells you that Covid stopped being dangerous because it mutated and we always knew that would happen, ask them why HIV never mutated, but it’s no longer a major threat to me.

While you’re at it, ask them why Remdesivir (an expensive patented retroviral) apparently works on both HIV and SARS-Cov2 but Hydroxychloroquine (an inexpensive generic) only works on HIV.

And why an HIV vaccine has proven impossible to produce, but scientists knew how to produce a covid vaccine within days of sequencing the virus.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Weatherall 2y ago

or just punch them in the mouth

mrclownworld 2y ago

Tried this and have found they don’t respond well but that doesn’t mean it’s wrong

Emperor Kuzco 2y ago

The one that got me as there was approximately 5 cruise ships (maybe 10k people) off the coast west coast of the US, they flew in PCR tests that supposedly worked for a novel virus. Where did these tests magically appear from? As far as I know no one died on the cruise ships because the media would have been all over it.

It was all a giant statistical scam that the media spread as fear porn.

mrclownworld 2y ago

I’m jealous of you guys who got it early. I didn’t necessarily trust the media, but I did trust the doctors in my family… until it turned out that they were brainwashed by the media. Big disillusionment for me.

Ike 2y ago

After you're done asking and had no answer to those, it'd be a good next move to research how no virus has ever been scientifically shown to exist. Contagion is also a pseudo-belief. That's why the controlled alt-media is running with spooks like Malone, peddling the lab covid nonsense, prepping the people with "chaina atakd uz!!" nonsense.

Real scientists have been sounding the alarm for decades. Look up Perth group on HIV and tests, you'll have a deja vu for sure.

https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8

mrclownworld 2y ago

💯 💯 💯 💯 💯 I was just trying to keep the post short and simple but yes

SMS 2y ago

Deniability somehow lost.

😉

SMS 2y ago

🎚️

mrclownworld 2y ago

Ok I had been down this rabbit hole a bit. But since you shared this I’ve gone deeper. It’s crazy how pseudo-scientific virology is. Based on circular logic and the promotion of a certain product with sham evidence of efficacy. Insane.

Ike 2y ago

The Insillico magic tricks 😆. Check out his lates, part 2 of a series made for dr. Mark Bailey.

Those tunnel-visioned "researchers" are referencing pseudo-scientific papers since the 20s. No postulates met, no valid controls... "trust us, bro!"

a source familiar with the matter 2y ago

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/the-virus-concept

What do you make of the electron micrograph images purporting to show viruses?

All mammalian viruses seem to be round blobs which are pretty unconvincing images, but bacteriophages have that classic "lunar lander" look that seems unlikely to be some subcellular component.

Do you think these are fabrications? Artifacts? Something else?

mrclownworld 2y ago

I’m recent in this rabbit hole and I’ll check this piece out, but essentially I think the confirmation by antibiotics and electron microscopy of actual microbial pathogens (bacteria, etc) was such a big win for allopathic doctors that the public followed them into pseudoscience about viruses.

In the case of bacteria, they had a treatment that provably worked with antibiotics. But they only had an unfalsifiable preventative measure for viruses in the form of vaccines.

Add some Rockefeller money and patents and civil engineering which cleaned up cities and eradicated most childhood disease and you’ve got a recipe for a snake oil hoax.

In other words, they overplayed their hands and the public just never challenged it. Then the money became too good to ever reverse course. Reminds me of multiple other rabbit holes I’ve been down.

a source familiar with the matter 2y ago

I think the work of virologists has been thoroughly unscientific

I'm not sure whether germ theory as a whole ought to be rejected - my guess is that contagion is a real phenomenon but requires some sort of ill health to become vulnerable to infection (so strict germ theory a la Koch's postulates is false, as demonstrated for example by his own experiments with cholera)

Do you think contagion is a real phenomenon?

Ike 2y ago

Contagion has been successfully falsified around the so-called spanish flu afaik. Still a good period for medical doctors as the rockefeller influence had yet to spread nation-wide.

If you want to entertain another concept of "illness", think of disease as a process of cleansing the body of toxins. The healthier a lifestyle - food, air, water, exercise, stress, pills, the rarer you'll be ill in the year.

A good confirmation imo about this are countries with beach resorts where hotels dump their sewege directly in the sea water. Coincidentaly the period of so-called summer flu, with diahrea/vomitting. "Summer virus", or what some call the shits, the body basically identifies the excrements from swallowing water while swimming and begins an emergency cleansing - all pathways become exit valves.

In any way, once you convince yourself that contagion is still only a theory, the lack of fear will greatly affect your peace of mind. In essence ideas like terrain theory promote an inner calmness while alopathic medicine basically is an engine of fear. Invisible, highly contagious and unstoppable pathogens everywhere...

a source familiar with the matter 2y ago

Strict germ theory (that a microbial pathogen is necessary and sufficient to produce illness) seems to me clearly false, and those influenza experiments are just one example

But the failure of strict germ theory doesn't rule out my modified germ theory, in which the animal must be in a state of ill health to be vulnerable to pathogenic contagion

The way to validate this experimentally would be a 4-group design, combining a health-reducing condition (eg nutrient deprivation or toxic exposure) with microbial exposure (and controls for each treatment variable)

mrclownworld 2y ago

This is extremely well said. I also appreciate this rabbit hole because it feels like one where genuinely the people at the top are more clueless than malicious. That’s rare. And like you said, gives a peace of mind.

mrclownworld 2y ago

To answer your question more directly, I think dying cells produce strange structures in an attempt to manage the waste, and the more shit you throw in the soup the more interesting the structures are going to be.