Avatar
AJ Nobody ⚡🏴 2y ago

If some moron owns an ordinal inscription jpeg, and the move it on lightning, could they conceivably lose it to chain fees, or routing fees? 🤔

Always looking for the schadenfreude angle.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Poppz 2y ago

It's always the first sat of the utxo, it's not real, it's a fictional way of counting sats, so you wouldn't lose it.

Avatar
AJ Nobody ⚡🏴 2y ago

That's a shame.

I was hoping for jpeg dust, or paid as a fee.

Sounds more like a website pixel.

Avatar
Poppz 2y ago

Yeah, but it's an elegant design.

Avatar
AJ Nobody ⚡🏴 2y ago

*Grudgingly agrees.* 🤝

Avatar
imnuso 2y ago

The schadenfreude kicks in when you realize they’re absolutely retarded and have to live the rest of their lives being that person making that kind of decisions 😬

Avatar
moonsettler 2y ago

you can't really move them on lightning sats are channel bound.

maybe you could bind specific sats to a statecoin and then transact the counter value on lightning and atomically transact that statecoin with the tx??