Avatar
imnuso
bef724f6f1f6cb54930c23aaa23f639b8bab67d12d4f37c53b48e8892930f78c
main() { printf(„hello, world“); }

Enduro > Maduro

I read some history books. It turns out that laws only protect those who establish or instigate them. Thinking in terms of individualism and collectivism is just residual statism because it hinges on the notion that what the general populace thinks or does is important. This is incorrect.

Replying to Avatar DeveRoSt

I used to believe this.

Yet another oil-rich country that intends to reject the USD … 🤣

Trump is furthering institutional bitcoin adoption through legislative support and retail adoption through increased market volatility ("tariffs").

Democrats will further institutional bitcoin adoption through money printing and retail adoption through incoherent legislation ("democratic process").

Nothing stops this train.

Putting the can into cantillon. Nice. Merry Christmas! 🥫🍕🎄

I'm about to start my daily DCA through the 2026 bear market. It's the best time of the cycle!

Build your inner citadel

I think Nick Land is an idiot. Just noting for later reference.

Everything you believe in is nonsense but that doesn’t make you an idiot. Not believing in anything at all does.

Replying to Avatar Ch!llN0w1

Isn’t a simulation a reality in itself? Isn’t every form of interaction a manipulation?

When people discuss simulation and reality what they really mean is control and knowledge, fearing they lack these, which they do.

We know nothing. We control nothing. Not even our next heartbeat.

Amazing what nonsense worries us. lol

Allowing spam ~> allowing pedo content ~> allowing states to totally control on and off ramps ~> KYC’d paper bitcoin only ~> bitcoin practically dead for 99% of population.

Fuck core. Run knots.

nostr:nevent1qqszcnlfn4ej5dnv72szqwnuwhkx066gu7unf0wy8rzc245edg29tegpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdu0ynqt8

Yes he’s positioning it as such don’t you think?

I have an opinion on that but I’d like to hear yours. So why?

He looks like a victim.

I’ve never met someone with enough bitcoin. Stack sats. GM ☕️

„If only“ is a red flag. It’s stupid because it’s naive, unreflected counterfactual thinking. I don’t trust people who seriously use this phrase.

People think it means „there should be a simple solution to this“ but what it actually means is revealed by dissecting its components:

„if“ - „I’m unhappy with the uncertainty of future outcomes and the optionality of the situation because I prefer a certain route or outcome.“

„only“ - „I’m unhappy with the complexity of the matter at hand because I prefer the comfort of thinking less about it.“

„If only“ just indicates you’re unhappy with realty but since reality doesn’t give a shit about that you can just skip this nonsense.

Gold lost as a money, meaning it lost for societies as a whole.

That doesn’t mean states don’t have use for it. It lost nonetheless. Big time loser.

Betting on gold rather than Bitcoin today is like betting on silver rather than gold back then.

If 13% of bitcoin holders take self custody that’s 1) sad, 2) maybe not as much a problem as it seems, and 3) roughly representative of the share of critically thinking people in any given society.

„AI prompting is an art.“

The art:

„Hey [AI of your choice], I want x and I need you to do y. Here are some specifics on what I want and please consider the following context information. Thanks.“