Viruses are not real. Realizing this opens the mind to what vaccines really are - snake oil.
Modern sources for this rabbit hole, sometimes referred to as terrain theory:
Stefan Lanka, Tom Cowen, Andy Kaufman.
Viruses are not real. Realizing this opens the mind to what vaccines really are - snake oil.
Modern sources for this rabbit hole, sometimes referred to as terrain theory:
Stefan Lanka, Tom Cowen, Andy Kaufman.
I'm still trying to reconcile this one. Certainly plausible from what I've heard from these people. As is typical, the 'experts' (even the good ones) don't want to debate it, which is a red flag.
Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a thing.
This aproach imo is the right one - there's many clues about it from the supposed "freedom right" movement and their experts, especially from their silence.
Virology is circular logic as despite the advances in technology during the previous century, viruses have never been shown to exist. They have also conveniently abandoned any meaningful, scientific postulates to go by. The latest trends with computer-generated/insillico viruses is literal make-belief stuff.
And when you realize that every government has health ministries/institutions, following charlatan practices in enforcing toxic injections (exclusively on the kids mind you), something surely has to click. You need the virus story in order to defraud the public and loot treasuries with the vax con. People into Bitcoin especially should be able to easily see the connection in this practice - Pfizer probably got hundreds of billions from tax coffers from the west, "because covid", and because they conveniently had sweet, golden-goose like contracts with every western tax colony regime. Their toxic soup was the most expensive liquid in all of history, and now afaik they are selling them for 10x. Gates is another clue, imo - not for his evil plans, but because his wealth comes mainly from tax dollars. He knows how to loot regimes, and they are more than happy to assist him, for a small cut of course.
Just another Nasa-like nonsense, really.
I’m still not there. I’ve heard compelling narratives but evidence for or against this is super difficult. It seems to me the viral theory is incredibly compelling based on how diseases travel, their severity, and the conditions that lead or attribute to their spread.
I’m open to the argument because everything at that scale is literally *inferred.* it’s not that we can just go looking at a drop of blood and count the virus like it’s bacteria under a microscope. It’s SO tiny and so dispersed that you basically see nothing. That realization, that many of these theories are really built upon inferences and responses to indicate the presence of something (kinda like how we “see” black holes by watching the stuff around it), it made me think twice about it, but I can’t really entertain it until I see a lot more evidence.
Might take the time to look into it though if you have a good resource/book/etc to recommend.
$boost
This guy is an agent for big pharma and the medical industrial complex. I see them all the time. They intentionally mislead in the hopes that some of you will get hurt.
#Fauci did this with President #Trump. Intentionally misleading him to make the pandemic worse. So he could sell his vaccines and stop Trump from getting reelected. Get it?
Then in comes big #pharma and the #medical industrial complex to Save! you..💊💉 When in fact they're the ones that poisoned you.
Every so often you hear about some healthcare worker who miraculously Saved! a bunch of babies or other people under their care who mysteriously crashed for some reason.
Only to find out later that they were poisoning the #babies and others. So they could play hero by resuscitating them. Saving! their lives. Real sickos. Get it?.👺👹🤡🤑💰💸💊💉🥴🤮😱😩😵💫🥀⚰️💀⏳
#covid #vaccines #mRNA #DNA #genetic #death
Viral mutagenesis was always what made sense to me
"it’s not that we can just go looking at a drop of blood and count the virus like it’s bacteria under a microscope. It’s SO tiny and so dispersed that you basically see nothing"
You can easily look up their claims - viruses are not at all "so tiny" to not be visible under microscope.
The dispersion claim is another story - how convenient that their scientists can't find a single virus in a live environment/tissue sample and always need a lab with artificially created medium. "Trust us, bro" is basically their science. Big pharma loves this, naturally.
For the curious:
https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/A-Farewell-to-Virology-pt-1-Final:3