No it's the opposite and it's about math not social, small blocks it's cheaper to make a node making tx on chain more expensive and an incentive to use LN.
Discussion
Did you read me argue against small blocks at all in this thread? Even one time?
And notice how you shifted your argument?
Do you know why you shifted it? Because you started from a social argument, which will keep you shifting until you fall to a fully logical one. Storage space is one of the most deflationary technologies we have it and will keep getting cheaper. Unlike ASICs that have ONE PURPOSE, SSDs have tens of thousands of uses.
In 10 years a 50TB drive will likely cost less than a steak and a potato. The argument is dumb. The poverty stricken person first has almost no BTC anyway and already does NOT and likely NEVER WILL run a node.
But this argument is iron clad, "Bitcoin is a protocol, it has a specified means of change, that means is consensus. Run a node/mine and participate in consensus. If you don't get your way in a BIP, STFU and move along or FORK OFF away from us".
There is no response to that other than fallacies and pleadings and other shitcoiner bullshit. We have the fortified high ground, why the fuck should we go down into the valley and expose weak flanks?
nostr:npub1h8nk2346qezka5cpm8jjh3yl5j88pf4ly2ptu7s6uu55wcfqy0wq36rpev see above, I'd love your thoughts on this, since I took some of it (a single word "social") from you.