Read between the lines.

Is it normal for several well-known bitcoin "influencers" to turn against knots and the people who use it? Hey, if knots is harmless, just forget about them, or are you afraid that the monopoly will end without the consensus of the core paid for by the miners?

You put too much effort into defending spammers, how curious.

The argument that filters are useless is also very absurd. They have always been useful, even if you have to go directly to the miner, which implies that they are useful for something, that private mempools are created? Go ahead, let the market decide.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No, it really doesn’t make a lot of sense for anyone to turn against knots because it doesn’t hurt anyone.

You can't possibly be calling me an influencer, but here's my take:

- filters help your mempool, but that's tiny and not a problem

- all the spam in the world only serves to make full blocks, and at no point has anyone said "man, i wish these blocks weren't so full"

- knots is a silly modification of core with poor opsec

- do what you want? but, like, maybe make good choices

Hahaha, he's just talking nonsense. Knots runs the filters that worked up to version 25 of Core. Think for yourself and don't just believe what your influencers tell you.

Lol, I'm submitting this as proof of Nostr Influencer status

Are you really filtering anything running knots? Fees are the only filter imho. Knots as a push back to core policies is fine but don't delude ppl saying it makes a difference cuz it does not

Who said knots makes a difference? Look up all my comments about knots, you fool.

Smartass, aren't you saying that filters are usefull?

It's incredible to see how silly people get upset because you use or recommend knots 😂

nostr:nevent1qqsfuzldl08x2u7rc58qtz6nqs9f3w4wlmzxavpevur0x5fl4h9usqga7xrrn