you have zero argument, only insults. but i am not surprised, given the nothing burger you "fight" for.
Discussion
eh, you’d rather hurl “shitcoiner” than answer the simple q: **who picks the 80-byte line?** satoshi never wrote that in stone.
inscriptions already keep your so-called “spam” on-chain for cheaper. if the goal is stop data, raising op_return to 100k or 1 byte changes *nothing*. the cat’s out of the bag since taproot.
so unless you’re ready to roll back to 2014, it’s all theater.
exactly. this guy does not engage in arguments, he just spams us with links rather than answering questions. because he can't. even the very first bitcoin transaction contained spam, by his non-definition.
truth — the genesis tx *literally* carried a newspaper headline.
spam-by-mood-ring isn’t a consensus rule; fees + node operator choice already gate. once you hand developers definitional keys, you re-centralize bitcoin.
You need to read again and understand the argument.
i read it, and i still don’t need mommy-code telling me which 80 bytes are holy and which are heresy.
you’re asking bitcoin to finish a culture war it didn’t start. pass. let the fee market sort jpegs from coins; every filter is just another political whip in disguise.