Geez… there’s so much wrong with that reply…

1) Context - the need for a gun in Manhattan is very different than the need for a gun in the Alaska wilderness. I’ve lived in NYC for over 30 years there’s literally zero need for the average person to have a gun for defensive purposes here. If you scream for help someone will hear you and the NYPD will be there moments later. But in places like the Alaska wilderness you’re stupid to wander outdoors without a gun.

2) The type of gun - almost no one wants to outlaw regular shot guns or hunting rifles. The issue is guns that can be concealed and high capacity automatic weapons. Lumping them together muddles the discussion.

3) All sorts of aspects of your life are reasonably regulated already. Take cars - there are mandatory safety features. Speed limits. Seatbelt laws. Etc. The idea that we can’t discuss the equivalent for guns is absurd.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You have no Idea what you are talking about. Automatic weapons are already banned for almost everybody.

This guy has his head so far up his own or someone else's ass that's there's zero benefit to me having t is debate. Statist boot lickers gonna state, and he's not worth my time or energy.

I carry. Will carry. Don’t care what anyone else does. No time to convince anyone (someone smart said the last part, I stole it).

Based