Why to stack reason number 8,743 just dropped.

By the way the US government says "Bitcoin is property, not money".

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp78xcep59u0q2fyqvv8z0cgpdh8rtlp6v98xqs60aa92y5pn9r9fqqsgdd2nx2hzjzs5s54mxawgnfwtdmr2p4fn07xn262fr3gamq38wtsjeuc2f

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

For tax purposes, but what about for constitutional purposes? Do they draw a distinction? This is from the linked court document in that article. Interesting how they argue that money isn’t property for constitutional purposes. Sounds completely asinine.

Well, when theft by force is dicey, you go the fraud route...

And pretend it ain't theft at all... πŸ˜‚πŸ˜œ

There will be plenty of lemmings to lap it up...

Of course they say that bitcoin is property.. you pay capital gains on property (that you sell). US$s are NOT property so you can't take a tax loss due to devaluation...

The sickness is deep. πŸ˜‰

You absolutely can take the loss by selling and with no wash rule too.

Oh I see you meant a capital loss on dollars, technically you can do that by Forex trading.