I’m not making a distinction between custodial and self-custodial Lightning, I’m making a distinction between how Muun and other LN wallets work.
Muun doesn’t give you the same way of doing custodial LN since they don’t hold your funds, so they do a more “synthetic” version of LN (since you as a user never really have an LN balance)
Just want to acknowledge convenience and adoption will require trust models at the usage level. Self custodial multi-sig doesn’t make an espresso easy to buy. Have to have both and guide people to manage risk. Using both models simultaneously ultimately enforces the NYKNYC understanding IMO.
You are talking about an entirely different topic: you are talking about trust models.
My comment was entirely about the technical differences of implementation that makes the comparison of fees paid under that model different (we were talking about fees, not trust models).
Looking back that is fair. Wrong thread to start that convo.
