Hey nostriches, anybody here who understands coinjoins background in details?

I have a question concerning address re-use.

1) Please have a look at this video and please comment those who understand that problematic.

Was this Wasabi 1.0 or Wabisabi 2.0?

2) Is it technically possible that address reuse can happen?

3) Please, only constructive information, no beef between 2 sides. I don't seek for a information what is better...

Thank you

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alcLdBsoDDg

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I've watched this video months ago.

It concerns wasabi 1.0

According Samourai, there are serious flaws in wasabi conjoin implementation (at least in version 1.0)

Disclaimer:

I'm a retarded pleb.

Don't trust me at all.

I run 2 dojos (ronin dojo, and dojo on bare metal - installed according tutorial from raspibolt.org), and I'm also conjoining using sparrow wallet.

I'm using Samourai wallet and cahoots as postmix strategy.

Bitcoin is permissionless protocol, so wasabi blocking utxos (based on CA data) from conjoining is IMHO against the ethos of Bitcoin.

So from this reason for me wasabi is absolutely no go.🚩

Anyways, Bitcoin is different things for different people, everybody can do what they want.

thanks for the opinion. Appreciated. I am trying to figure out if wabisabi 2.0. is having any issue with address reuse. Blocking UTXOs is another topic.

What i want to crack and understand how that works with address reuse if theres any flaw in the code that might happen. Would be much appreciated if others can answer. Who sees and understands that.

The address reuse issue should be already fixed in 2.0

We'll see whether Wabisabi will get demixed.

Indeed.

It was Wasabi 1.0