It is within perfect reason that you can see Rottnest from the shores, buy you may need to take your telescope again to check. Do you claim to recall seeing the beaches of Rottnest through the lense, or just the peaks of the hills? Also, do the online horizon visibility calculators factor in gravitational lensing?
Discussion
Let me know what you want me to be able to see, and from where and I'll see what I can see!
Either way, it's all just a projection of our subjective perspective and it's all all energy, frequency and vibration anyway. It's all quantum.
Thoughts on being a quantum earther?
Earth is the continuation of the longest chain, lead to humans, then led to bitcoin.
The quantum ledger.
Intriguing! Is there anywhere you can send me to follow up on this, or any sort of elaboration?
I'm picturing fractal ophran earth blocks.
Only your mind for now. I am working on physics of Bitcoin/quantum ledgers. Bitcoin is clearly the answer to quantum mechanics, just no one else wants to see it yet.
Might be more like the physical laws of our reality are the quantum computer, and DNA is the most advanced program running in it because said program is self assembling, self improving (through trial and error) and self aware.
Well, yes I agree, but Bitcoin is now the most advanced program running it.
It's like we've gone from archetypal (Earth), represented by something like the 64 hexagram I Ching, to biological (Human) 64 codon DNA, to the digital (Bitcoin) 64 bit realm.
Bitcoin is the first time that entropy resolution is permanent and conserved universally. Conservation is not an axiom with Bitcoin. It’s the re-instantiation of the ruleset forward into time. Bitcoin isn’t temporary, it’s the fractal rule.
Hey, how are you? Apologies for being so precise, but I think you’re leaving out something essential about the hexagrams. They are more than an archetypal map of Earth — they’re a cosmological code of the whole universe. In classical Taoist thought, they arise from Wuji, the undifferentiated void, into Tai Chi, the great polarity, and unfold through the continual transformation of yin and yang.
From this movement come the five elements and the eight trigrams, which generate the 64 hexagrams. See verse 42 of the Tao Te Ching — it is the one that lays out this cosmological sequence. Taoist cosmology always places Tian (heaven), Di (earth), and Ren (humanity) as an inseparable triad: the resonance of heaven, the grounding of earth, and the mediating role of humanity. The 64 hexagrams embody that triad and become the energetic template of universal motion.
In classical Taoist thought, the I Ching, beyond being a book of divination, is also a calendar system and a way to read the cycles of change. The hexagrams are both cosmological and chronological, tracking time not in a linear sequence but in cyclical patterns of transformation. They have been used in different traditions as a kind of time code: in Chinese medicine, for example, they correlate with the rhythms of the body and the seasons, showing that time is a living rhythm of breath, season, and cosmic recurrence.
In Human Design, every gate holds a particular frequency. That frequency creates a resonance that defines uniqueness. The gates, the lines, the color, the tone, and the base are all fractions of time, fractal intervals that layer from surface to depth and define the uniqueness of every person. They serve as a blueprint of singularity. The profile defines which part of the stage your soul’s journey has come to be, while the deeper layers of color, tone, and base shape how that journey is embodied. So the 64 hexagrams are a code that holds cosmology, chronology, and individuality as one field of resonance.
The 64 hexagrams have also been correlated with the 64 codons of DNA — the building blocks of life. Each codon is a three-letter sequence of nucleotides that codes for amino acids, and together the 64 codons form the complete genetic code. Martin Schönberger first developed this DNA–hexagram correlation in The I Ching and the Genetic Code: The Hidden Key to Life (1973), which was later incorporated into Human Design. Richard Rudd expanded on this foundation and recast it as the contemplative framework of the Gene Keys.
There is also a digital mirror: Bitcoin itself is secured by SHA-256, which processes data in 64-bit words. The 64-fold structure repeats across cosmology, biology, and cryptography. Hexagrams, codons, and code — each is a language of order, timing, and transformation.
In that sense, yes, there is a correlation: the 64 as a universal template — expressed as hexagrams in Taoist cosmology, codons in biology, and 64-bit structure in Bitcoin.
⚡️☯️
Hey Monika, all good here ☺️.
Well I can't write like that, so I'll leave that for you!
But yes, it's torus fields all the way down (/ 64 tetrahedrons).
I also noticed an interesting thing, when you divide 1-64 by 64 the answers reduce to the original numbers numerology value!
The universe repeating its own pattern indeed!
You'll have to highlight me on what being a quantum earther means. Do I believe in quantum theory?
Perhaps both/all possibilities exist in the quantum field. Say, both globe and flat are both subjectively true because they exist in consciousness fields, but ultimately it's all energy, frequency and vibration eminating from the void of God.
Cmon man, you can do better than that. You said you could reason from first principles. I'm still not seeing a need for flat earth as a plausible explanation for anything.
I actually said that I find that debates don't get you very far and asked if you'd ever entertained it yourself. Which ended up in you wanting me to justify myself.
Sorry. I thought you wanted to hash it out. My mistake.
It's more my fault for the initial post, and I shouldn't claim to know these things. I think the universe probably works in ways that I can't even imagine, let alone figure out.
Looking forward to catching up with you again one day brother 🙏.
According the the online calculators, you should see the top sections of the hills of Rottnest from the shoreline. You're claiming you can see more than that.
You're right, I will have to do this experiment properly for myself one day. I've seen other claims of being able to see way further, but haven't verified them for myself.