You gotta either define species to back up your claim, or don't bother complaining about my correct definition. And people make their environment, the environment doesn't make the people. You could take every Nigerian and put them in Norway, and take every Norwegian and put them in Nigeria, and within 5 years Nigeria would become civilized and Norway would become a third world shithole. Japan is Japanese because of Japanese people, not because of its location. India is Indian because of Indians, and so on. And NONE of them owe mass civilizational suicide or a "better life" to anyone.
Discussion
At this point I'm pretty sure you are American, so you should be really ashamed that a non English speaker has to teach you your own language, but here goes:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/species
Take a look at D.
Now about this Norway-Nigeria stuff, that's about sociocultural factors, nothing to do with "species"
There is zero reason, other than what you WANT to believe - what you WISH were true - to incorrectly believe that behavior and environment has nothing to do with genetics.