Omg I can't believe he said all that in the last part of the lecture and then throws it all out and says there's no freewill. He basically proved there's free will with all that history! What a let down... I go from, "this dude is making basic statistics errors lol dipshit," to "didn't expect him to switch like that, good one, this is great!", and then he ends by negating everything he just said.

Apparently its a glass half fumpty kind of thing. If you think there's free will, it's obvious, but if you don't, then nothing can convince you.