What's the difference between a racist and a bigot? Also, am I a racist if I think what the Jews are doing is genocide or if I think the Palestinians are evil for wanting the Jews dead? Is it bad to want jobs for the people to whom govt is supposed to be responsible? Can I put a fence up around my property to keep people who aren't my family out? All these terms seem difficult to pin down. Maybe you can post a glossary to help us understand what you mean.
Discussion
Your attempt to conflate complex issues through false equivalencies doesn't merit debate. If you're genuinely interested in discussing any single topic, I'm happy to engage with facts and precise definitions. Otherwise, I'll assume you're not seeking honest dialogue.
I am serious that you don't define your terms. I love my gay sister, brother-in-law and niece very much, but I also believe marriage is a sacrament of the church to which they willingly don't belong.
Just because I don't want military age men flooding the Texas border where my family lives doesn't mean I'm a racist.
I would suggest by not being specific about what you mean, you're not serious about conversation.
The question I posed in the above note is a real one that gets to the heart of what it means to be a racist. Is it defined in terms of some generalized hegemonic oppression, a particular agenda, or does the word actually mean something?
Your statement perfectly illustrates why I block certain content. Claiming to 'love' your LGBTQ+ family while declaring they 'don't belong' because of their sexual orientation or gender identity is textbook bigotry.
Dehumanizing rhetoric about 'military age men flooding the border' instead of seeing people seeking safety only reinforces this pattern of prejudice based on nationality and ethnicity.
No amount of religious justification or deflection changes this fact: judging people's right to belong based on their fundamental human identity is bigotry. Full stop.
Where does this fundamental human dignity derive?
From the same source you invoke to exclude others. If you believe in divine creation, then you must accept that all humans are created with inherent dignity - not just those who match your interpretation of belonging.
Every major faith tradition teaches this fundamental truth: human dignity is innate, not earned or granted by human judgment.
Your selective application of divine love contradicts its universal nature.
You didn't answer the question. Where does human dignity derive? Innateness isn't something you can prove. It's just an assertion.
Invoking "inherent dignity" is a euphemism for maximizing parasitism.
Where is the dignity in sucking the blood and energy out of selected plebs to feed other plebs?
The major faith traditions are wrong. There is no "inherent human dignity."
Ava's parasitical Marxism shines through.
Marxism is the most dehumanizing idea ever hatched by Homo sapiens.
Accordingly, Marxism came straight from the Jew.
Ava wants to engage in forced parasitism through the Marxist state. Of course, she is an internationalist. She supports international parasitism.
Blood and energy are to be drained from selected productive plebs and funneled to other plebs.
Ava is a genuine psychopathic parasite.
What Ava doesn't realize, however, is that she will only be a junior partner in the vanguard party.
The Jew always rises to the top in its own system.
Ava is literally expressing a logical fallacy.
It is not the first or only one.
Saying we, as humans, already put in action our best qualities and choices. As if we make no mistakes (the very existence of logical fallacies prove we make a lot of those).
We miss the target. That err is "pecare" in Latin. That is sin.
We are called to convert.
We step away from God's Glory.
The way to live up to His Love for us, thus our dignity, is by abnegation.
Not by embracing our sinful habits.
Go and sin no more.
Excerpt:
"We Can’t Escape
Sin is a constant of the human condition. It’s all around us. It’s inside us, too. We are all sinners. Sometimes our sins are large, like adultery or murder. Sometimes they are as small as a harsh word or a cutting glance. But they’re always there. We sense that things shouldn’t be this way, that there must have been a time when things were right in the world. And there was such a time."
You shouldn't go on the defensive when you're dealing with Marxists and Jews.
Terms like "racist" and "bigotry" have no meaning in nature. It's nonsensical.
Look at what the people employing such meaningless terms do, and what system they create.
It is pure parasitism.
Marxists and Jews are extremely aggressive breeds.
If you make one defensive move, you're ultimately fucked.
Go straight for the jugular.
Kill them all with extreme prejudice.
Eh. Seems strong. I would prefer that everyone stop the killing and the manipulating and the accusing. But I may just be idealistic.
These are not complex issues.
There are no definitions in nature.
Ideas must be judged on their equivalents in parasitism.
Ava wants a Marxist state apparatus to redistribute life force.
This state, according to Ava, needs to be international in scope.
This state of affairs must be forced, according to Ava.
This certainly fits the definition of psychopathic parasitism.
Therefore, Ava's ideas must be discarded altogether.
Racism is OK. It's genetically encoded in the brain.
Killing Jews is OK.
Jews can do whatever they deem appropriate, but exterminating the Jewish race is perfectly fine as well.
You don't have any property. You own nothing.
"Your" children are owned by the US Congress and the POTUS. That's why they can be locked down and injected.
I do think what ia being called "racism" it was encoded at Babel to prevent the hubris that was gripping humanity and still otherwise would. And while I don't disagree with how the US govt views my children it was not successful at getting me or my family vaccinated.