Replying to Avatar mike

You took me down a wrong path, you are arguing for worse videos because of limitations in network capacity or high billing costs.

Seriously, I'm used to 1Gb/s fibre or 5G-A cell speeds. When I'm in the UK, I have shitty FTTC and bad mobile coverage. This is the problem, not high quality videos.

I understand and accept the problem you have, but making shitty videos is not the solution.
Avatar
Ryan 2mo ago

nostr:nprofile1qqsglv2qkn5dmmuhee9cy8fywfu2rfp4xd3xy0myqg2gfvmjl9yqqrqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0crg0k2 what do you think about this? You host this guy's videos. We should all be posting 4k? 🤦‍♂️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
mike 2mo ago

Of course, I'd use more storage and bandwidth and need a bigger plan.

They'd make more profit 😂

You're really not arguing about 4K videos, you arguing about network inadequacies which I get and agree with.

You are correct and a short term fix is reducing the video quality, but I'm pretty certain we're not all sitting on YouTube downscaling our videos for the next generation of network technologies appearing over the horizon 😂

Avatar
mike 2mo ago

What we need is a scaling video render system which produces copies for all devices across all networks, we're talking about it here:

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp6pmv65w6tfhcp73404xuxcqpg24f8rf2z86f3v824td22c9ymptqyv8wumn8ghj7enfd36x2u3wdehhxarj9emkjmn99uqzqu067v9a6n76xyg7v7uwarkazf9056rtd78r5zm04w79vj8waqremsezmp