You took me down a wrong path, you are arguing for worse videos because of limitations in network capacity or high billing costs.
Seriously, I'm used to 1Gb/s fibre or 5G-A cell speeds. When I'm in the UK, I have shitty FTTC and bad mobile coverage. This is the problem, not high quality videos.
I understand and accept the problem you have, but making shitty videos is not the solution.
So, until around 2000, my families company Densitron Microwave built Isolators & Circulators for GSM base stations, we sold that company as cellular was taking off.
My company Densitron Internet built the early Internet from 1989 to 2002.
I think it's time, we re-enter these markets to finish the jobs we started.
I want to post 4K/30 Vlogs and have nobody moan that they can't stream them.
nostr:nprofile1qqsglv2qkn5dmmuhee9cy8fywfu2rfp4xd3xy0myqg2gfvmjl9yqqrqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0crg0k2 what do you think about this? You host this guy's videos. We should all be posting 4k? 🤦♂️
Of course, I'd use more storage and bandwidth and need a bigger plan.
They'd make more profit 😂
You're really not arguing about 4K videos, you arguing about network inadequacies which I get and agree with.
You are correct and a short term fix is reducing the video quality, but I'm pretty certain we're not all sitting on YouTube downscaling our videos for the next generation of network technologies appearing over the horizon 😂
What we need is a scaling video render system which produces copies for all devices across all networks, we're talking about it here:
