Replying to Avatar Matt

Be that as it may, I don't support ripping people out of a country that was designed to be a refuge for people who want to be free and work. I agree that they should have came here legally, but most Americans probably couldn't stay here if they had to meet the same standards. We should reform the legal requirements and give the illegal people here an simple way of righting their wrongs. Just kicking them out is inefficient and unproductive. It'll also undoubtedly lead to abuse of American citizens when the inevitable "show me your papers" shit starts.
af
Condor 8mo ago

All starts with welfare. If people were coming to find freedom and safety I would agree but most came because they can get free money and a treatment that is not even given to the citizens in poverty. That upsets people. While it's ok to help, it's not ok to refuse assistance to your people to help others that probably would have never helped you. We should thank for this horrible situation all those politicized NGO's that brought people for a purpose and that purpose was not to help them. Now the honest good people are paying the price.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Matt 8mo ago

Ending welfare and the handling of people who are living here illegally are two separate things. You're making it a binary issue. It's possible to do both things. And I haven't seen convincing data to support what you're saying.

af
Condor 8mo ago

Every time someone brakes the law they get ripped from their families and go in jail. This is considered socially necessary to protect the honest people that follow the social rules. Entering illegally in a country doesn't happen. It requires a planning.