It’s definitely possible to do algos right. Think what’s missing most is ability to turn them on or off, and get to build/choose what you want to use.
nostr enables all of that.
It’s definitely possible to do algos right. Think what’s missing most is ability to turn them on or off, and get to build/choose what you want to use.
nostr enables all of that.
Few
Agree, I just wonder if I would actually choose the most beneficial one or just get trapped in the most short-term gratifying
This 💯
besides algos, your client’s addictive UX features could be turned on and off
I’m thinking it will also be the same with Reputation analysis… different services, relays or marketplaces may award you different scores depending on what they feel is valuable
Alternative services, relays, marketplaces may respect these scores or employ their own
There needn’t be a single best way to do anything… and yet everything could be chosen by the individual
アルゴを正しく使うことは、間違いなく可能です。最も欠けているのは、それらをオンまたはオフにする機能、そして使用したいものを構築/選択することだと思います。
nostrはそのすべてを可能にします。
#[0]
While you can switch out relays or audit the code of your clients, it‘s not clear to me how you would even find out about a bad relay.
So lets take the responsibility of ordering events correctly:
Could‘t one relay simply deliberately take very long to hand out certain events? How would you notice?
Nostr is the first protocol protecting the digital integrity fundamental right.
Algos are ok as long as the individual can choose which algos to use and switch them off.