Prove to everyone XMR doesn’t have a supply bug and then we can talk
Discussion
Prove you are wanker becauase you cant prove your are not.
Bitcoins supply is absolutely provable. The fact that you have such an emotional response tells me everything I need to know. You can’t prove xmr supply, you know you can’t prove it has no supply bug so you’re acting out emotionally
Us waiting for you to prove Bitcoins supply without merely running a node exactly like any Monero user would
Prove that XMR has a supply bug and then we can talk.
You are making a claim then it is up to you to prove it.
That’s not how it works. Bitcoin you CAN verify the supply at any time. How does XMR verify this for all blocks? It doesn’t have the same cryptographic proofing to as BTC to do this.
In fact, someone discovered an XMR supply bug back in 2017 by chance. You have no idea what you’re even talking about clearly since it’s been an issue with XMR in the past.
What is the difference between a Bitcoiner relying on their node to verify supply and a Monero user relying on their node to verify supply?
You can do simple verification with Bitcoins supply, but who does? NO ONE DOES. Bitcoin is approaching 1 billion transactions and growing. Infeasible that even a single person has verified them all. Every ten minutes?
Bitcoin noderunners were obliviously unaware of this supply bug that would've been undetectable if exploited. Luck + a single honest anon was all that prevented it:
bitcoincore.org/en/2018/09/20/notice
Everyones node would be telling them Bitcoin supply looked fine, but the exploiter would be claiming spent values twice. Undetectable if you aren't combing through all inputs and outputs yourself and only relying on your node.
It’s literally a concern laid out on moneros website, feel free to educate yourself because Bitcoin supply auditability and Monero supply auditability are not the same
“At the end of the day, there are tradeoffs inherent in supply-audit design choices. You can choose to represent amounts in the clear, like Bitcoin does; you can be sure that the supply is what you expect it to be (or fork to ensure this in case of exploited inflation), but you sacrifice fungibility and could expose users to personal risk. Or you can choose to hide amounts like (shielded) Zcash or Monero do; you improve privacy and fungibility, but at the cost of offloading supply soundness guarantees to the correctness of proof and signature constructions”
Yes, I know I know.
That all sounds great in theory, but I'm talking about in practice, how it works in the real world.
You didn't answer my question:
What is the difference between a Bitcoiner who relies on their node to verify supply, and a Monero user who relies on their node to verify supply? They both depend on their node to properly audit supply.
I just showed you a supply bug exploit in Bitcoin that would've gone undetected by noderunners.
If no one takes advantage of Bitcoins simple transparency by checking it themselves...simple transparency doesn't benefit them.
You are literally doing nothing different from a Monero user and imagining that you are