Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Rijndael

Nothing undermines whatever point youre trying to make like going straight to name calling. Take a step back, and get your emotions under control.

What do you think a UASF is? Its a group of people saying “we are going to start enforcing new consensus rules”. If those people are in the economic majority, then their fork wins. If not, it looses. Thats what bitcoin consensus is. Its the rules enforced by the economic majority.

If you are convinced that the economic majority of nodes thinks that inscriptions are invalid transactions, then you should enforce that rule. If you think that the economic majority of nodes think inscriptions are valid transactions, then enforcing that rule puts you on a minority chain.

Avatar
Colby Serpa 2y ago

Your software is not a backwards-compatible UASF — it’s an attack on bitcoin that breaks the network at scale.

nostr:note13fm33yrnfn2sfzzf72qxptjtnktk3g3h23lhhu5unf3rtsn8tylqtzpvqt

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Rijndael 2y ago

Patches welcome!

Avatar
Colby Serpa 2y ago

Patches? You’re being disingenuous once again.

I said: filtering your mempool is fine — deciding what makes a block valid, like your software aims to, is an attack.

Here’s the patch:

Delete Repo’ —> Are You Sure? —> Yes

Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed