More than quantum threats and even more than spam, I am concerned about the lack of interest in Bitcoin privacy.

However, as you know, without privacy there is no freedom and so on.

That said, it's also worth studying what Signal or SimpleX have done with regard to quantum computing. It's all about assessing the risk-benefit ratio, which is obviously not the same in Bitcoin as it is in Signal.

Just another drama, while the bad guys continue to win day after day, as the world gets worse and worse and Bitcoin has failed to solve anything (and neither has Monero 😂).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Bitcoin was never designed to be private. Unfortunately. It was written to be censorship resistant. Which is good. I do agree though that the lack of understanding of privacy is astonishing. Also the state attacks on those that do seem to not even ruffle the feathers of plebs. Heartbreaking.

#FreeSamourai

More than bitcoin, where there is currently no way to make it private without breaking some of its properties, I am referring to L2s.

L2s are all experimental unfortunately. I use/run lightning, have done for 5 years and outside of custodial wallets, not a lot has advanced. I don't think it is as bad as some people say. If you run your own it can be relatively private but without Bitcoin there would be no L2s, so bitcoin privacy practices are essential

The ignorance, laziness, stupidity, and sheer unwillingness to think of the majority is the undoing of many great ideas, ideals, and discoveries.

its sad but we always have to learn the hard way.

even if we adress the hoax of quantum in the next 24hours it wont take long to find something else, like alliens with telepathy or whatever...

again its sad.

🎯😂