Go build this crap on bitcoin cash with Roger ver and everyone else who thinks they know better than satoshi

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What? Satoshi made a great thing and maybe could have continued making great contributions, but i wouldn't assume that only he knows what's best for Bitcoin going forward. It's an open and decentralized protocol. Whats best is whatever increases adoptions with the least impact to bitcoins strongest properties including decentralization and fixed supply

What happened to “You don’t change Bitcoin, Bitcoin changes you”

Just a couple short years ago Ben thought Munity was a good idea, now it’s a dumpster fire. We don’t want that to happen to Bitcoin.

Bitcoin at its base layer works and is completely fine. Go fuck around and find out on a layer 2 solution and if that’s not enough GFY and go build on a fork of Bitcoin.

Im not advocating for changing bitcoin, just pointing out that satoshi left, bitcoin has changed and the people using and developing it now are who matter.

Re: op_cat. I think the great script restoration makes sense and a lot of smart people are interested in op_cat. It's definitely beyond me, but if enough devs think its a good idea then lets see what happens.

However, i dont think everything that can be done with bitcoin as it is today has been explored and that should happen before it's changed

Nah, it's an evolving working progress, always has been. To survive it must continue to improve.