That’s okay. Genuine question not a rude gotcha attempt: would you ever consider a scalability fork? Let’s say Bitcoin swallows everything in 20 years and demand is so off the charts a base chain transaction is $1000 each or maybe even $10,000 or more all the time in today’s dollars, would you consider then or still a no? If not why?
Discussion
Absolutely. In that scenario I'd almost certainly agree to a change. We might all be on L2s at that point and the fees are necessary to secure the network so we'll see but I'm open to alterations just extremely conservative. I'll give you a quick example, my WordPress site ground to a halt because there were to many plugins and one as stuck in an event loop draining all the server resources. Now I just use it as a website and moved all my cms elsewhere, it performs much better. It's small scale put the principle holds.
Interesting perspective. I'm generally in the camp of "push Bitcoin to the limits of its current form, then discuss upgrades."
Absolutely
I think push to the limits and then discuss change is a rational anti-scalability fork for now position for sure. I just fear when people say no changes forever. That’ll kill Bitcoin. 🫡