Pre-1971, the Fed could print money, but only when a precedent made it palatable for the public (e.g.: war, after propaganda).

But then Nixon removed that filter, which didn't work anyway, and the rest is history.

Do we really want the equivalent of that for spam in Bitcoin?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You have a vote though. It’s called running a node and convincing economic nodes to do the same

Honestly, I don't see many similarities. Help me understand them better please

It’s not spam it’s shitcoins

You either discourage it or encourage it

Core is working for shitcoin scammers

Shitcoins are money printers

But if they pay for the space in the block, how do you stop them? As a last resort they can go to the miners 🤷‍♂️

Hey dude

If the block is accepted by the network ok. But I won’t help spam become accepted by relaying the it through my mempool. Do you call spammers back when they call your phone? Do you give them your contact list so they can call more people?

Or it doesn’t matter because I can’t stop all spam? Pathetic argument.

And also blue haired core devs don’t get to tell other people what to do with their nodes.

If you relay spam on your node you can go fuck yourself 🧡

The real question is: what is spam

No it’s not. That’s a red herring

The question is what is Bitcoin.

Do you think it’s money? Or is it a big scam just like ethereum. Decide for yourself

Bitcoin is freedom 🏴‍☠️