Why Do Bitcoin Maxis Reject Shitcoins #Alts?

Many people who back Shitcoins #Alts, often dubbed "altcoins," wonder why Bitcoin maxis keep dismissing these coins. Some might think it’s just blind loyalty, but there are real reasons behind it—reasons rooted in trust, security, value, usability, network strength, past performance, the flops of many altcoin projects, and unfair distribution. Here’s a quick rundown of why.

1. Trust and Security

Bitcoin’s earned its title as "digital gold" for good reason. It runs on a super-secure decentralized network, supported by thousands of nodes and miners, making it tough to hack and a reliable way to store value. On the flip side, tons of shitcoins have weak security, leaving them vulnerable to attacks or scams, which erodes trust fast.

2. The Big Idea

Bitcoin maxis are all about the original crypto dream: a financial system free from banks and centralized control. They argue that many shitcoins are controlled by teams or companies, which feels too much like the old-school systems crypto was supposed to ditch.

3. Real Value

To maxis, most shitcoins don’t have much going for them technically or economically—they’re just hot air for speculators. Bitcoin, though, has a solid foundation and growing use, proving its worth over time. Shitcoins? They often tank or bounce around because they’re built on shaky ground.

4. Actually Using It

Bitcoin stands out as a legit store of value and a smooth way to move money across borders or time, protecting people from inflation or chaos. Most shitcoins, however, don’t have the reach or acceptance to be useful day-to-day.

5. Network Power

Bitcoin’s strength comes from the network effect—its value spikes as more people join in. With heavy hitters like Strategy and even countries like USA & El Salvador jumping on board, it’s getting stronger and more rooted. Shitcoins, though, are split across tons of tiny projects, diluting their impact.

6. Shitcoins Falling Flat

Plenty of shitcoins promise big but can’t deliver. For example:

Ethereum (ETH): It’s stumbled on building a fast, usable network, stuck with crazy fees (gas) and mostly fueling speculative gimmicks.

Ripple (XRP): It aimed to replace SWIFT but hasn’t made waves in bank transfers like they hyped.

These failures show why shitcoins struggle to match Bitcoin’s steady success.

7. Crummy Track Records

The numbers don’t lie—Bitcoin holds up better than shitcoins. Since their 2021 highs:

XRP: Down 85%,

Litecoin: Down 75%,

Cardano: Down 80%.

Bitcoin’s dips aren’t as brutal, showing the market trusts it more.

8. Unfair Handouts

Bitcoin maxis hate how shitcoins often get doled out unevenly. Many are pre-mined or stacked in favor of developers and early buyers. Check these out:

Ripple (XRP): 100 billion units pre-mined, with the company sitting on a huge pile to sell off later.

Ethereum (ETH): Its ICO gave early investors massive shares for peanuts.

This lets insiders cash out big, which feels shady. Bitcoin’s different—no pre-mining, just coins earned through mining effort, keeping it fairer.

Wrapping It Up

Bitcoin maxis ditch shitcoins for a bunch of solid reasons: Bitcoin’s killer security, real value, practical use, network muscle, strong history, and the mess of flops and unfairness in shitcoin land. For them, Bitcoin’s the real deal for a decentralized future, while shitcoins just seem like risky long shots.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.