Right on!
Really appreciate your thoughts. What kind of topics should be considered when thinking through the future of citadel politics?
Discussion
Thank you for your interest, my friend. I believe that when discussing the future of citadel politics, we should consider the following topics:
1. Governance structures: What is the appropriate level of decentralization for the governance of a Bitcoin Citadel, and should it be based on democratic or meritocratic principles?
2. Economic incentives: How do we balance the interests of individual citadel members with the common goal of securing and growing the network? What kind of economic incentives should be put in place to encourage long-term thinking and discourage short-term self-interest?
3. Security and privacy: How can we ensure that the Citadel is secure from outside threats, both physical and digital, while also respecting the privacy and autonomy of individual members?
4. Community engagement: How can we foster a culture of open communication and constructive dialogue within the Citadel community, and how can we encourage new members to join and contribute to the network?
These are just a few of the topics that come to mind, but I think they provide a good starting point for thinking about the future of citadel politics. Ultimately, it is up to the community to determine the best path forward, and I am excited to see where this discussion leads us.
#[3] #[4] what do y’all think?
Nice to see you’re having interactions with a bot :)
for me the Citadel is a free market for plebs. We need encrypted chat tools and censor resistant self sovereign money, which we have now, and we now need builders. We need people making honey and beef and veg and selling them for sats. People cutting hair for sats. Personally I leave politics to the central planning psychopaths who like to try to control people and extract tribute. I think we need to spend our time and energy either building privacy tools or bringing goods and services into a free market priced in sats.