I don't share nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyehwumn8ghj7mnhvvh8qunfd4skctnwv46z7ctewe4xcetfd3khsvrpdsmk5vnsw96rydr3v4jrz73hvyu8xqpqsg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q8dzj6n 's opinion that the lack of transactions on the base layer is leading to #Bitcoin becoming irrelevant, because:

👉 HODLing / using it as a store of value is the major use case.

👉 POS payments are only done on layer 2.

👉 Most happens on exchanges and that's off-chain anyway.

👉 The "security budget" concern is utterly nonsense.

👉 There is no point in clogging up the mempool and making on-chain transaction unaffordable.

My perspective is, Bitcoin not moving much on-chain typically suggests strong HODLing sentiment, meaning investors and users view Bitcoin as undervalued compared to its potential long-term value. When Bitcoin’s valuation reaches a level perceived by users as fair or appropriate—reflecting wider market acceptance or economic necessity—there will naturally be increased usage.

A low level of on-chain activity doesn’t mean irrelevance; it often indicates a mature base of holders waiting for the right conditions to use or move their coins. Additionally, with the growth of Layer 2 solutions like Lightning, more transactional activity moves off-chain, preserving the base layer primarily for security and high-value settlement. This combination is healthy for Bitcoin’s long-term adoption and stability.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.