I hereby signal I will not support any change to NIP90 that changes the very nature of it. If the core devs decide to go for http API calls and bots for it's replacement I will not comply. If clients decide to go with it, be my guest. We have something unique and instead of embracing it, there's plans to replace it with the mess from the old web.

I'm not saying everything is perfect right now. I'm saying killing of a unique feature is not something I will support. If the free market supports their plans, so be it. I don't.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Good thing the NIPS repo doesn't matter ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ we can use NIP-90 even if fiatjaf deletes it

This is all so stupid.

What is a core dev?

The nip cabal

I have two nips. Do I get to join the cabal?

they are still PRs amirite?

Oooooh... you guys are talking about code. I thought you were talking about boobs. Nevermind.

If this is about code NIPs and not nips, then my opinion is

The minimal entry requirements are three nips.

I know a guy who could join, apparently. 🤔

Legendary.

What about OnlyNIPs folks like me?

I support this. NIP-90 is largely fine as it is, it just needs some updates and clarity.

nevent1qqs2067pxj5cdlrvm8twvz6z4xqfng93kvw4g4pzt0pu2943egkkprqpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcswrcva