RFK is a good candidate. IMO one of the best we’ve seen in a long time. But I still can’t figure out why he is (or was) so opposed to nuclear, and shut down a nuclear plant in NY that forced them to use more fossil fuels. Everything i can find about his position seems to relate to the economics of nuclear.

Have his stances changed? Was it simply a misunderstanding of nuclear 5 years ago? Or was the technology for nuclear different 5 years ago?